Not really, some things come down to execution and some things come down to coaching. With Gilmore, it's the coaching that is a problem, and that has little to do, IMO, with the dropped balls today, which were execution issues (or poor preparation issues, which reflects the whole staff and not just Gilmore). Just saying this call for Gilmore's firing should not be seen as a knee-jerk reaction to a couple dropped balls in one game.
We need to do something well. No more "jack of all trades & master of none" multiple junk. It could be the Pirate's TT offense, P. Johnson's triple option...."something" that we do well.
You won't like this bshirt, but we will always be multiple, no matter what we do, whether it's the TT offense or the triple option. Multiple in that you have to be able to hit the defense in many different ways. Even out of the zone read, we are multiple. Any respectable system of offense is going to be multiple.
And yet the irony is, in the eyes of Husker fans who complain about the multiplicity, it will never be multiple enough. Because you hear things like "Why didn't we run the UCLA pistol plays, shovel passes, QB bootlegs. Where were all these different packages?"
The truth is fans want extreme multiplicity. The ability to pick any play out of any formation like you'd do in a Madden game. But in their heads, it is "being really good at one thing," running for example. If we are really good at running there's no reason to suppose we can run any type of running play and put up good stats. Now, since that means we'd be just mediocre at passing, naturally we should be able to run any kind of pass play with equal proficiency - we'd just put up lesser numbers than dedicated passing teams.
That really isn't how it works, though.