Michael said:
I do have a legitmate question though as it pertains to our offense. So many are using the excuse, "Well, the players on offense aren't Watson's players, they are Callahan's players."
Hmmm, okay. Well, wasn't Shawn Watson there when Callahan was recruiting? And what about our defensive players. They were almost all recruited by Callahan and yet they are playing ridiculously well. So what's the difference? Well, I know the difference, but for everyone defending the offensive coaches, what is the difference? Shouldn't the offense be close to the level that the defense is playing at?
Yeah, there are alot of seniors on the defensive side of the ball, but look how ridiculous Suh has become since the Pelinis rolled into town. Dillard wasn't even third on the depth chart a few games into the season and hadn't done anything under Cosgrove/Callahan. Asante was a below average saftey. O'Hanlon, I'm not even sure he saw the field under the previous coaches. Look how the defensive coaches developed players THAT THEY DID NOT RECRUIT for their system. Pretty amazing at the difference in performance between the defense and offense.
I think that's the biggest thing in all of this. We simply have dead weight position coaches.
People can hate on Callahan all they want, but he was directly responsible for our offensive line and coached them way more than Wags ever did. We constantly put lower tier talent and turned out respectable offensive lines.
I still remember that Alamo Bowl game. We put Seppo and Slauson at tackles, and had them going up against Lamarr Woodley and Alan Branch. Those guys more than held their own.
Callahan may be a many of things, but the guy was an absolute technician and a wizard of an offensive line coach.
Then Barney comes in, and every single bit of the progress our line made was changed. He even went as far to criticize the way Callahan had the line play. I know every coach in the country likes to think they know more than others, but there are few line coaches in the NFL or college you would put ahead of Cally. Real talk.
In any case, at no point in his coaching career has Barney shown to be even an average coach. Not in his initial run here. Not at Iowa State. And he's doing the same thing again here.
He took a line so well skilled in technique, from proper hand placement, pad level, foot placement, and took them into an 80's style of line 'em up then knock them down. He preaches little technique and it leads to so many mistakes. This is the reason we have so many breakdowns, especially with penalties that kill alot of the drives we do begin to put together.
Then you have Gilmore - of all the WRs we have had since '05, who has made a drastic improvement over their time in this program? You could possibly say Todd Peterson, just because he was a walk-on. What WRs that showed inconsistency ever improved under him?
Nunn? No.
Gilleylen? So far, no.
Hardy? No.
Holt? No.
Even with Niles Paul making big catches, the guy still has his mental mistakes that have not been corrected in 3 years.
The only 3 WRs worth a darn that have ever played under Gilmore here are Swift, Peterson and Purify. But from day 1 each of those guys showed great hands and never had a consistency problem or those constant mental mistakes that plagues so many of our other WRs.
Bet no one has even realized that we have not had a single WR to break the 1k mark either under Gilmore. We have only had 2 WRs even break the 800 yard mark for a season. In 5 years.
--
If our offense wants to take a step forward, they need to get at least one of these guys out of here this offseason. If you don't, it won't matter who our OC is. They will still have the same fundamental flaws they have now because we have position coaches who are simply not that good.