Guess that's, um, good news, then.:facepalm:
This already happened in 2009. 2010 is the start of a new decade, not the last year of a previous decade.
Yeah, don't worry about it. I remember them throwing that up on ABC and just thinking, "Really, ABC? Didn't we celebrate the millenium in 2000, not 2001?"Guess that's, um, good news, then.:facepalm:
This already happened in 2009. 2010 is the start of a new decade, not the last year of a previous decade.
So it's me and the dips***s at ABC who didn't know that then. chuckleshuffle chuckleshuffle
Clearly the suckiness has robbed me of a few IQ points. <_<Yeah, don't worry about it. I remember them throwing that up on ABC and just thinking, "Really, ABC? Didn't we celebrate the millenium in 2000, not 2001?"Guess that's, um, good news, then.:facepalm:
This already happened in 2009. 2010 is the start of a new decade, not the last year of a previous decade.
So it's me and the dips***s at ABC who didn't know that then. chuckleshuffle chuckleshuffle
The 2000's = suck for Nebraska football. Hopefully we can start getting some championships again soon.
Consecutive 9 win seasons, consecutive smart head football coaches..We had a lot of streaks broken in the 2000's. Consecutive bowl appearances, consecutive Top 25 ranking, etc.
Actually, you are wrong. In fact, 2000 wasn't the new millennium, 2001 was. (The millennium concept is open to debate, however the counting of decades is not really disputed) I remember this being discussed at the turn of the century/millennium and most people misunderstand it. THis is a copy-pasta form the first thing Google pulled up. Dig deeper if you want.:facepalm:
This already happened in 2009. 2010 is the start of a new decade, not the last year of a previous decade.