From the other thread, remember what FSU's motivations are:
-FSU is pissed at the ACC for their incompetence (there's no way they should have come out with a lower payment per school/per year than the Big XII--unless maybe they had Dan Beebe doing negotiations?)
-FSU needs money to build facilities to compete not only against other ACC teams, but the whole of the SEC. Each SEC school makes more money than FSU does, and the SEC is using that to help take recruits in Florida that FSU would have easily nabbed before. Can't remember the article, but it mentioned that FSU was being beaten out on recruits by the Mississippi schools, and that MSU and Vandy had better facilities than FSU did.
-FSU needs media exposure. The new ACC deal doesn't provide anywhere close to the same level of exposure that the SEC deal currently does. Plus, the SEC is rumored to be looking at creating a SEC Network in the same style of the Big Ten Network (read: a whole conference endeavor). FSU *would* be able to create their own network in the Big XII, but it will be a low-production value affair, and FSU would have the burden of all start-up costs.
FSU can't remedy these issues by joining up with the Big XII. Sure, they'll get more money, but they'll now have network and travel costs to eat away at whatever bump up in pay ($3-4 million/yr.) they would get.
Will FSU go anywhere? I don't know, but I think there's enough anti-ACC rhetoric out there on FSU's part that it will be tough for them to stay. But when you examine the motives behind FSU's displeasure with the ACC, it becomes clear that they won't resolve their problems by joining the Big XII--they'll just delay the inevitable. The B1G is the only conference FSU could join that would provide them with enough money, a big enough network, and enough clout to take on the SEC.
This would be geographically retarded.
Agree.
As geographically retarded as West Virginia in the Big XII though?