VectorVictor
New member
Yes, I did, so I do understand why you asked. It was the most recent example.
And you obviously missed the point of the post. If folks want to actually discuss the dynamics of this in a coherent, academic manner, then cool.
If you’re going to selfishly tee off on the opposition without even attempting to understand the discussion and it’s points (e.g. Dewiz’s post), then not only is that part of the problem, but these posts should be called out.
- - -
As for the topic at hand, I get why people ascribe meaning to the SSB—people have pride in their country and the people that they feel support and defend it. But that meaning doesn’t exist for everyone, and forcing someone’s views on others is anathema to what these same people proclaim makes this country great.
Maybe if the people that that had issues with people kneeling legitimately researched and listened to those kneeling, we could resolve these problems and move on to bigger things. Instead, we have people that instead of listening for knowledge, they go to their echo chambers for codification and reinforcement of pre-conceived ideas, and they don’t listen. One side of this argument is significantly more guilty of this than the other, to be honest.
- - -
One other thing—I mentioned before that the SSB was written by a slave owner and someone with a deep animosity towards minorities (especially those who were enslaved and fought for their freedom by joining the British). Someone here suggested that we replace the SSB with America the Beautiful, and I think that’s a wonderful idea. One thing I always have to remember is that just because an idea or action is tenacious, that tenacity doesn’t define its worth. This is one of those situations.
(Sorry for any errors—on mobile device as I’m in class right now)
Last edited by a moderator: