• Huskerboard's guidelines section features two new rule updates.

    We have added formal language to the guidelines page regarding the politics and religion forum and the use of AI-generated content. The political policy is not new, but the AI update has been added to align us with modern forum best practices. Please review these changes at your convenience.

Frost Fired!

Toe said:
I mean it seems pretty clear that the university believes that he is not owed.
Click to expand...
They are not saying that at all. They are saying it was not served correctly. Trying to get relief on a technicality. If they thought it was owed, they would asked for an outright dismissal.
 
krc1995 said:
They are not saying that at all. They are saying it was not served correctly. Trying to get relief on a technicality. If they thought it was owed, they would asked for an outright dismissal.
Click to expand...
Or this is simply the path of least resistance. Trying to prove validity means they have to go to court, this filing is a way to prevent even getting to that point. Most times the goal is to avoid having to go to trial.
 
Ever drive by big houses in your town or city or neighborhood and wonder how they can pay for it?
Because there are judges, lawyers, clerks, and litigation.
The university could write a check. Frost could just f’ing drop it. But both sides have lawyers. And lawyers tell both sides they should fight it and, maybe kinda sorta could or should win.

The judge will grant motions written by the lawyers @ $300/hr and the clerk will receive them, given off to the judge. The judge will review the case and set a date 15-18 months from now, at which point the clerks will write up a review to the judge and advise them on course of action.
Over the next 15-18 months the lawyers will will write drafts, confer with their claimant, have a status conference or two, enter new evidence….all at $300-500 an hour.

Etc etc etc. until they reach an agreement, which will be that one party will save face and someone will pay out a little. That’s how they afford those houses.
 
If there is someone that actually knows WTH this is really about and wants to post it, or even msg me I’d be grateful.
 
krc1995 said:
They are not saying that at all. They are saying it was not served correctly. Trying to get relief on a technicality. If they thought it was owed, they would asked for an outright dismissal.
Click to expand...

They are asking for a dismissal. See Hilltop's post.
 
I wonder if this situation played a part in Trev deciding to jump ship to A&M? Trev was pretty outspoken when announcing Frost's dismissal that the contract would be paid in full, Nebraskans honor their word, etc. In leaving, reports were that he was frustrated by others in the Administration and/or Board of Regents. If they were playing these kinds of games behind the scenes, I could better understand why an AD would be frustrated.

IMO, the University should resolve this ASAP and not play games with the taxes or trying to find loopholes on this one. The longer this goes, the more money will be spent and the darker the cloud.
 
Wistrom Disciple said:
I wonder if this situation played a part in Trev deciding to jump ship to A&M? Trev was pretty outspoken when announcing Frost's dismissal that the contract would be paid in full, Nebraskans honor their word, etc. In leaving, reports were that he was frustrated by others in the Administration and/or Board of Regents. If they were playing these kinds of games behind the scenes, I could better understand why an AD would be frustrated.

IMO, the University should resolve this ASAP and not play games with the taxes or trying to find loopholes on this one. The longer this goes, the more money will be spent and the darker the cloud.
Click to expand...
I don’t know, but I think it had zero impact on Trev. At the end of day A$M is a bigger and more prestigious job. Just the way it is.
 
Toe said:
Link: https://archive.is/5V990

Click to expand...

Ok so you get a pay day of $9.5 million for not working and you go to court over $1.7m tax 'burden'. Even Jethro Bodean and his 6th grade education doing the ciphering could tell you that Frosty is ahead by $7.8 million. Talk about entitlement. For the results of his coaching, he should have been paying us fans the $7.8million just to put up with his inability to put a winning product on the field.
 
Speaking of Naught equals Naught - Frost should NAUGHT coached at Neb and Neb should NAUGHT have hired him


There may not be a college coach who has benefited from a stronger public relations push despite how long it's been since he last had any success than former Nebraska football head coach Scott Frost. Despite being an unmitigated disaster in Lincoln, there seems to be an article every few months that tries to pitch Frost as a victim who got bullied and picked on by Husker fans.
This month, the media member trying to make Frost look like a victim of outside forces is On3's Brett McMurphy. His article, as one Reddit user helpfully pointed out, shows that Frost is a heck of a tough guy. He doesn't let anything bother him most of the time, but somehow, the Cornhuskers were the worst thing to ever happen to him.

Scott Frost's latest PR push shows he wasn't suited at all for Nebraska football​

"UCF coach Scott Frost ran w/the bulls in Spain, cage-dived w/great white sharks & climbed the highest peaks in America," McMurphy wrote on Twitter advertising the article. "But nothing was harder than dealing w/the Nebraska noise: "I don't want to talk about Nebraska at all,'' Frost is credited as saying.
“I do not want to talk about Nebraska at all, but what I will say is in 2017 (at UCF), we’d win a game at home and (his wife) Ashley and I would drive a mile off campus somewhere and nobody would really bother us or say anything to us. There’s a freedom to that allowing you to just try to excel and not worry about the outside noise because it could be crippling at times in certain places."
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top