No, Joey's been passing for more like 278 yards per game + 20 yards rushing per game. Most games, he does very little on the ground, with some exceptions like K-State (95) and NMST (69).Joey's been passing for more like 300+ yds/game + the rushing.
I don't believe Spiller runs a 4.25 40 and I absolutely don't believe the other guy runs a 4.12. Like yea, he runs a 9.0 100M, shoulda been in the Olympics that guy.
Jeez, how many times do I have to say this. This isn't an analysis! The company designed a simulation engine to simulate various sports games, and they model the teams, then throw them in the simulator and we see whatever gets churned out. That's all it is. When you sim the game in NCAA 09, is it an 'analysis'? Is it your 'prediction'? If Nebraska loses 0-45, does that make you an 'idiot'? Come on! You guys are taking this way, way too personal. it's a simulation, for chrissake. yell at the computers all you want, they don't mind.no doubt. brilliant analysis. cant wait for his election prediction
motorboatjonesNU said:This sim is pretty goofy. I ran our reg. season with best 2 of 3 taking the game.
We went 5-7 reg. season, losing to:
West. Mich :LOLtartar
San Jose St. :WTH
VT
Mizz
TT
Baylor :moreinteresting
OU
I stopped paying attention to 40 times a few years ago, when jumbo Dan Alexander, who ran a 4.4 or 4.5, pulled away from the CU safety who ran like a 4.2 40.jjamuss said:oh? fast players, we havent seen anything like it... mizzou, ou, texas tech, kansas... even CU had some quick feet. I think we can coral your "speed" and give it a dose of BOFENSE that will stop it in its tracks.tigerinnebraska said:I will put my money on one running back, 4.25, another 4.40, wide reciever 4.12.
These are all 40 times. Oh, also have a senior that has more receptions than anyone in acc history, (Kelly)
Speed kills, Huskers have not seen speed like this.
If you live in omaha, come to clancys at 114, I will be the guy in the clemson coat.
Game speed.I stopped paying attention to 40 times a few years ago, when jumbo Dan Alexander, who ran a 4.4 or 4.5, pulled away from the CU safety who ran like a 4.2 40.jjamuss said:oh? fast players, we havent seen anything like it... mizzou, ou, texas tech, kansas... even CU had some quick feet. I think we can coral your "speed" and give it a dose of BOFENSE that will stop it in its tracks.tigerinnebraska said:I will put my money on one running back, 4.25, another 4.40, wide reciever 4.12.
These are all 40 times. Oh, also have a senior that has more receptions than anyone in acc history, (Kelly)
Speed kills, Huskers have not seen speed like this.
If you live in omaha, come to clancys at 114, I will be the guy in the clemson coat.
Joey Ganz Career Passing Stats(for games started):zoogies said:No, Joey's been passing for more like 278 yards per game + 20 yards rushing per game. Most games, he does very little on the ground, with some exceptions like K-State (95) and NMST (69).zE bOp said:Joey's been passing for more like 300+ yds/game + the rushing.
And seriously, Ganz threw for ~160 yards against NMST, and just over 200 against Oklahoma. I don't know why all of you seem to think that every player must put up his statistical average in this bowl game, because I promise you that is not going to happen. The sim had Joey rushing 10 times, which is more than what he usually does. It's more than generous.
I don't believe Spiller runs a 4.25 40 and I absolutely don't believe the other guy runs a 4.12. Like yea, he runs a 9.0 100M, shoulda been in the Olympics that guy.
I agree zE bOp, but the simulation gave him 10 carries for 45 yards, which I think is very fair.He's a very effective rusher AND they subtract sack ydg from rushing totals. But his 20-30 yds/game are usually at key times.
sure, np, but that sim in general sounds like a bunch o' horse phooey.I agree zE bOp, but the simulation gave him 10 carries for 45 yards, which I think is very fair.He's a very effective rusher AND they subtract sack ydg from rushing totals. But his 20-30 yds/game are usually at key times.
What is their track record? How have they done in bowl games this year so far?It think the interesting point was the computer played the game 1000 times with Clemson winning 61% of the time with the average score 24-22. That shows that they are fairly evenly matched.
I wonder how they have the players for both teams weighted.
I think they are only right on about half so far:What is their track record? How have they done in bowl games this year so far?It think the interesting point was the computer played the game 1000 times with Clemson winning 61% of the time with the average score 24-22. That shows that they are fairly evenly matched.
I wonder how they have the players for both teams weighted.