Hollow as a 30 year old dead tree.Like I said, it's not like we were freaking Baylor. 10-3 and a top 15 final ranking isn't "nothingness."
Gimme a break. Running with guys who are built to pass? Check the run/pass distribution from the last two years. You'll see it's right around 50/50.Callahan has THREE SEASONS to effectivley transition a run-attack to a balanced attack using square pegs
Crotchety, bitter old donors.There is a reason that they are still not paid for.
Who are you referring to?Six years? There have been many who have done it in less time, with much less.
It's not like he took over Baylor.
Your totally right about this...Tom Osborne inherited a 2 time defending champion football team, and it took him 20+ years to win his first National title.Six years? There have been many who have done it in less time, with much less.
This whole comparing Callahan to Osborne bit is getting old. For those of you have forgotten, Osborne changed offenses too in the late 70's. He went from a pro-style offense to the option, without an option qb which was much tougher than what Callahan did. He still won 9+ games every year, never went under .500, went to a bowl every year, and finished in the top 20 every year.Your totally right about this...Tom Osborne inherited a 2 time defending champion football team, and it took him 20+ years to win his first National title.Six years? There have been many who have done it in less time, with much less.
MAYBE if we woulda canned osborne sooner on, somebody else woulda came in and then Nebraska would REALLY be considered a powerhouse..
:sarcasm
Stoops and Weiss come to mind immediately.Who are you referring to?Six years? There have been many who have done it in less time, with much less.
It's not like he took over Baylor.
Stoops and Weiss didn't invert their offense, either.Stoops and Weiss come to mind immediately.Who are you referring to?Six years? There have been many who have done it in less time, with much less.
It's not like he took over Baylor.
It can be argued that in both cases, talent was there. Especially in Weiss's case. In Oklahoma's case, you had proven recruiters like John Blake there. In fact, people who are into saying coach x took coach y's team to big game z would say that Stoops took Blake team to a National Championship. I am not one of those guys because I think it's an asinine thing to say. My main point here is that every situation is different, IMO it's really hard to compare things like that apples to apples. That and I don't think Stoops is an amazing coach.Stoops and Weiss come to mind immediately.Who are you referring to?Six years? There have been many who have done it in less time, with much less.
It's not like he took over Baylor.
Why can't you compare the 2? Sure Osborne's record and stats are better, but what was the biggest problem fans had with him? He couldn't win the big games, like Oklahoma or any Florida school.This whole comparing Callahan to Osborne bit is getting old. For those of you have forgotten, Osborne changed offenses too in the late 70's. He went from a pro-style offense to the option, without an option qb which was much tougher than what Callahan did. He still won 9+ games every year, never went under .500, went to a bowl every year, and finished in the top 20 every year.Your totally right about this...Tom Osborne inherited a 2 time defending champion football team, and it took him 20+ years to win his first National title.Six years? There have been many who have done it in less time, with much less.
MAYBE if we woulda canned osborne sooner on, somebody else woulda came in and then Nebraska would REALLY be considered a powerhouse..
:sarcasm
Let's put that dog down.
Do you not realize the talent Blake had in there? Blake wasn't ready to be a head coach and motivate, Stoops was. Period.Stoops and Weiss come to mind immediately.Who are you referring to?Six years? There have been many who have done it in less time, with much less.
It's not like he took over Baylor.
Nice post, Husker X. :thumbsSometimes I don't know what I'm more sick of. USC praise, or Callahan bashing? You know why? Because they're both so damn easy.
It doesn't take any real thought to reach down into a statistical bag of bullsh#t related to a team which is rebuilding from days of decadent nothingness. Every time I read some nonsense like this I just want to put my head through a wall. For you people who still have some flagging question about the recruiting, let me spell something out for you.
You cannot expect to win championships until you build DEPTH
Callahan has THREE SEASONS to effectivley transition a run-attack to a balanced attack using square pegs for round holes, and yet is STILL managing to pull in 5 stars from all over. And never mind that we've beat several top 25 teams whose only reason for not remaining in the top 25 is the fact that we beat them. And never mind that we were within a touchdown for a combined win over Texas and Auburn. Oh, and forget that Michigan win, too. We didn't exactly get slaughtered by the Condoms, either––a miracle with our corners.
Forget the fact that we've yet to have a truly phenomenal quarterback who can throw the deep ball and scramble a little bit. Forget that even in spite of some rocky times these last few years the support base has still produced massivly updated facilities that are practically the 8th wonder of the football world, added to the stadium, maintained our sellout record, turned out huge spring game/Fan Day numbers season after season, and are holding coaches clinics where some of the biggest names around are hanging out.
Good Ghandi. I cannot wait for this so-called "signature win" to occur. Then maybe you people can shut the hell up.
For not the final time:
:bonez USC must be razed to the ground. :bonez