GT: FGCU at Nebraska - 8PM - BTN

[It'sNotAFakeID]

Seriously, why didn't they look at the trend of scoring over the past 5 years? Was it steadily decreasing? Or was it high one year, low the next year, then high again? And why didn't they look at other variables? Maybe college basketball scoring was low because there just weren't many good shooters in the league.

 

[PaulCrewe]

I personally think the new rules will hinder scoring. The out of bounds rule will slow the shooters that love coming off baseline screens, and free throw shooting had been suffering for years

 

[308_Husker]

Looks like ol' Timmy has this team going in the right direction. Win or lose tonight, I'm glad we have that guy as our coach. He's completely changed the attitude of the program. TO did a great job revitalizing it as well.

 

[It'sNotAFakeID]

Shavon Shields is a champ.

 

[PaulCrewe]

Seriously, why didn't they look at the trend of scoring over the past 5 years? Was it steadily decreasing? Or was it high one year, low the next year, then high again? And why didn't they look at other variables? Maybe college basketball scoring was low because there just weren't many good shooters in the league.

Sounds like a project four ya stat boy.

 

[Omaha-Husker]

I hate when announcers don't know their stuff. We scheduled this game after their tournament success.

 

[Minnesota_husker]

Foul.. foul..foul...foul... ENOUGH

 

[It'sNotAFakeID]

39-25 Huskers. Really good first half for this team. Lovin' it.

 

[Omaha-Husker]

The energy this team is playing with is incredible. I think these guys really believe that they have something really good in Lincoln.

 

[Something Clever]

Good first half, FGCU is no cupcake

 

[PaulCrewe]

Guard depth may come in handy down the road with Biggs and Gallegos if the team struggles with the new ticky task, no hands officiating

 

[BigRedBuster]

I still have no clue how this season is going to end up but......it's been a long time since I have seen this kind of athleticism on a husker team.

It's going to be fun.

 

[Mavric]

Seriously, why didn't they look at the trend of scoring over the past 5 years? Was it steadily decreasing? Or was it high one year, low the next year, then high again? And why didn't they look at other variables? Maybe college basketball scoring was low because there just weren't many good shooters in the league.

2004 - 68.8

2005 - 68.7

2006 - 69.0

2007 - 69.1

2008 - 68.1

2009 - 69.2

2010 - 68.6

2011 - 67.6

2012 - 68.0

2013 - 67.5

 

[kreutz35]

These refs are calling every little thing...

 

[It'sNotAFakeID]

That's ridiculous.