cmb23 said:
Yeah. Don't try and skew this. Their helmets definitely hit. That pic was after they hit and his head was bouncing off.
But I'm not in support of the personal foul call. When a 6'7" guy tackles a 6'6" guy...aren't their helmets going to hit 95% of the time if a 'good fundamental hard tackle' is made on a QB? But, if Potter goes low and get his legs he's going to miss or get called for going at the knees.
Well my coach would have benched me if I tackled helmet to helmet. A good fundamental hit is putting your shoulder pad right into their midsection and driving up and back. If you try to tackle that high, a good runner will duck right under you and leave you in the dust. The key to football is staying lower than your opponent. You never want to play "high" especially when tackling or blocking someone.
Um...I'm pretty sure that's what he's saying. That he didn't spear. It wasn't an illegal hit.
Uh, no he didn't spear. It was an illegal hit because the NCAA adopted a NFL rule which doesn't allow a defender to collide helmets with a QB. It's a stupid penalty, but it's a penalty none the less. Leading with the head is illegal at all times no matter whether you're running the ball or tackling. However, I believe the helmet to helmet hit is only illegal when tackling a QB unless he's out of the box.
Hmm, respectfully I would ask: why is it a 'stupid' penalty? I mean, the most severe, potentially life threatening injuries occur from blows to the head and neck. Concussions or vertebral trauma that can lead to paralysis or worse.
I think it's a good and necessary rule. No one wants to see players carted off on stretchers and wonder if the guy is gonna walk again, or die of respiratory or heart failure(yeah it's possible in extreme cases) cuz his central nervous system is damaged. What about players' families? How much do they worry about that stuff? The endless knee/ankle injuries are bad enough.
No, I'm all for hard hitting, but I'm also all for protecting players from unnecessary tragedy.