With or without sprinkles?All this talk makes me hungry for some ice cream
With any reason possible, I'm going over. I will caveat that this includes the time from now until fall ball starts. I think as Frost builds the foundation, things will get harder. Too drastic, too quick and it causes a lot of problems....Frost is calculated and smart about what needs to be done.Anyone leaving regardless of reason: transfer, graduation, no longer playing football, etc.
That's because it's a slippery slope to go down. People like to argue 'the team was better than 4-8 and here's why' while often ignoring the team was also pretty close to being 2-10. We can't have one without acknowledging the other.
I know it's hard to stomach but they were a bad team last year - they were a 4-8 team. They weren't good and they know it, even if their recruiting rankings and raw potential suggested things should've been otherwise.
Possibly squares trying to fit into triangular holes. No fault on the player but maybe a player without a position?Anyone leaving regardless of reason: transfer, graduation, no longer playing football, etc.
Possibly squares trying to fit into triangular holes. No fault on the player but maybe a player without a position?
Ben Miles is the first player that comes to mind.
With or without sprinkles?
Of course Frost is going to say that. He wants to pump them up. That team, especially on defense sucked. It was aided by very, very bad coaching.Weird, I recall lots of people recently arguing we weren't better than 4-8.
Agree with everything, except the freshman always better then the starters thing that Nebraska fans hold so dearly to their hearts.BlitzFirst said:It's not about that. We have the top recruiting class for the past 5-6 years in the B1G West. We SHOULD be better than 4-8 every year.
Frost isn't looking at PR or pumping anyone up. He's looking at the talent on the team and realizing he has a lot to work with and that we should have performed better. It's all coaching and preparation to be honest. It's not that we didn't have good players.
I know of at least 3-4 freshman/sophomores last year that SHOULD have played and didn't...especially along the OL. Mike Riley didn't put us in the position to win with the best players in my opinion....so, our record indicates a coaching shortfall but it DOES NOT equal a talent shortfall.
One could say at $50k a year they got a deal, i'd question that because I think his mediocrity is infectious, but who knows maybe its just a titular title they gave him and his real job is to massage groin injuriesHere's the most baffling part: Riley continues to be employed. How? Why did Oregon State hire him back? He has such an incredible, abysmal, pathetic track record of failure. How does he keep getting hired?? Just boggles my mind.
Probably better to say we were definitely a 4 - 8 "program" last year that could have easily been 2 - 10. To me, "Program" includes coaches as well. Team seems to get interpreted as just the players. While the program we definitely bad, the team, with better coaching and development could have been better than that.BlitzFirst said:I think it's more the fact that we have more roster talent than anything in the big ten West and yet underperformed more than all in the conference.
It's more of what other tms do with less.