Dont read it so literal Dev. You know what he means. And frankly, it really cant be argued with. There's numerous instances where the dline is taking a completely and exclusive containment approach to a rush. And it's not just last year. This dates all the way back to Bo's first year. See Virginia Tech, 2009 edition.devnet said:The point of argument many Nebraska fans make is that while everything you say is true, our lineman don't actually go after the quarterback. They engage their offensive counterpart, get to their position, and then they just sit and wait. How many times over the last two years have we seen quarterbacks with upwards of 7, 8, even nine seconds just standing in the pocket and our lineman aren't actually trying to get to them?
Your answer to my post is that our linemen don't go after the quarterback???? While playing college football??? Wow.
![]()
devnet said:The point of argument many Nebraska fans make is that while everything you say is true, our lineman don't actually go after the quarterback. They engage their offensive counterpart, get to their position, and then they just sit and wait. How many times over the last two years have we seen quarterbacks with upwards of 7, 8, even nine seconds just standing in the pocket and our lineman aren't actually trying to get to them?
Your answer to my post is that our linemen don't go after the quarterback???? While playing college football??? Wow.
![]()
Well i was wrong. it wasnt 10 seconds. it was 8, to the point where he actually decided to run.devnet said:The point of argument many Nebraska fans make is that while everything you say is true, our lineman don't actually go after the quarterback. They engage their offensive counterpart, get to their position, and then they just sit and wait. How many times over the last two years have we seen quarterbacks with upwards of 7, 8, even nine seconds just standing in the pocket and our lineman aren't actually trying to get to them?
Your answer to my post is that our linemen don't go after the quarterback???? While playing college football??? Wow.
![]()
Okay I guess you need proof.
devnet said:that's called a prevent dude. Watch the defensive end at the top of your screen...he doesn't rush ON PURPOSE. Not sure how a defensive lineman is supposed to take on shoelace in a 4 down lineman vs 6 blockers....I think you're asking a bit much of any line without J. Clowney in it
Its right, some times you really don't. If you want something you might be able to compare it to, think of a basketball team that has a bunch of slashers but no 3 point shooters, you play off of them, you invite them to shoot. If they got how and hit 8 out of 12, you live with it.devnet said:that's called a prevent dude. Watch the defensive end at the top of your screen...he doesn't rush ON PURPOSE. Not sure how a defensive lineman is supposed to take on shoelace in a 4 down lineman vs 6 blockers....I think you're asking a bit much of any line without J. Clowney in it
Oh. Well now that we've established that my original point is correct, and we were purposefully not going after the quarterback...
devnet said:So we're ALWAYS in a prevent is your theory eh? That's what a 2 gap is?devnet said:that's called a prevent dude. Watch the defensive end at the top of your screen...he doesn't rush ON PURPOSE. Not sure how a defensive lineman is supposed to take on shoelace in a 4 down lineman vs 6 blockers....I think you're asking a bit much of any line without J. Clowney in it
Oh. Well now that we've established that my original point is correct, and we were purposefully not going after the quarterback...
And it's also something you DONT see other teams doing. Especially to our "mobile" quarterback. I understand the concept, but personally I dont like it. Just get after it. If we get burned a play or 3 three so be it. It's also awfully stressful and tiresome to ask a secondary to chase receivers around for 10 seconds at a time on multiple occasions.devnet said:So we're ALWAYS in a prevent is your theory eh? That's what a 2 gap is?devnet said:that's called a prevent dude. Watch the defensive end at the top of your screen...he doesn't rush ON PURPOSE. Not sure how a defensive lineman is supposed to take on shoelace in a 4 down lineman vs 6 blockers....I think you're asking a bit much of any line without J. Clowney in it
Oh. Well now that we've established that my original point is correct, and we were purposefully not going after the quarterback...
I'm no coach and I'm no football expert. I just know that it's an incredibly common sight seeing our linemen engage their blockers and sit there waiting, not actively pursuing the quarterback. It happens often.
Also calling it a prevent seems weird and doesn't make sense to my understanding of a "prevent defense".
And it's also something you DONT see other teams doing. Especially to our "mobile" quarterback. I understand the concept, but personally I dont like it. Just get after it. If we get burned a play or 3 three so be it. It's also awfully stressful and tiresome to ask a secondary to chase receivers around for 10 seconds at a time on multiple occasions.devnet said:So we're ALWAYS in a prevent is your theory eh? That's what a 2 gap is?devnet said:that's called a prevent dude. Watch the defensive end at the top of your screen...he doesn't rush ON PURPOSE. Not sure how a defensive lineman is supposed to take on shoelace in a 4 down lineman vs 6 blockers....I think you're asking a bit much of any line without J. Clowney in it
Oh. Well now that we've established that my original point is correct, and we were purposefully not going after the quarterback...
I'm no coach and I'm no football expert. I just know that it's an incredibly common sight seeing our linemen engage their blockers and sit there waiting, not actively pursuing the quarterback. It happens often.
Also calling it a prevent seems weird and doesn't make sense to my understanding of a "prevent defense".