• Huskerboard's guidelines section features two new rule updates.

    We have added formal language to the guidelines page regarding the politics and religion forum and the use of AI-generated content. The political policy is not new, but the AI update has been added to align us with modern forum best practices. Please review these changes at your convenience.

*** Husker FB Misc Topic bullsh#t Thread ***

^  We just need to win consistently again.  At one time while Frank was coach, we ranked 5th in total wins.  Now we are 9th I believe.  What happened?  I think Bo did enough to keep us at # 5 but BC, MR, Frost and so far HCMR have allowed us to fall far behind.  Frank had one bad year - so that was just a small pimple on the win total.  If we start winning, the perception of Nebraska as a blue blood will rise.  This is especially true if we find ourselves in the playoff.   Otherwise, we'll just be Minnesota - a has been.  

 
TGHusker said:
^  We just need to win consistently again.  At one time while Frank was coach, we ranked 5th in total wins.  Now we are 9th I believe.  What happened?  I think Bo did enough to keep us at # 5 but BC, MR, Frost and so far HCMR have allowed us to fall far behind.  Frank had one bad year - so that was just a small pimple on the win total.  If we start winning, the perception of Nebraska as a blue blood will rise.  This is especially true if we find ourselves in the playoff.   Otherwise, we'll just be Minnesota - a has been.  
Click to expand...




Depends a little bit on how you count it, but in 2006 we got our 800th win, and were the 4th program to hit that mark. We're now one of 8 programs to have 900+ wins, in 8th behind the other 7 blue bloods and Penn State

 
I am late to this party but don't find these results surprising. This is generally what I remember as a kid. My Dad always told me how great the U of MN football team was but they were bottom of the barrel when I was growing up and were firm bottom dwellers with Wisconsin, Indiana, and Northwestern. His recollection was the National title contenders of the pre-1960's seasons. 

Interesting (at least to me) what you don't see- Texas A&M on any of these lists. They sure think that they are a blue blood but no one else does. 

GO BIG RED!!!

 
USDSM Huskerlover said:
I am late to this party but don't find these results surprising. This is generally what I remember as a kid. My Dad always told me how great the U of MN football team was but they were bottom of the barrel when I was growing up and were firm bottom dwellers with Wisconsin, Indiana, and Northwestern. His recollection was the National title contenders of the pre-1960's seasons. 

Interesting (at least to me) what you don't see- Texas A&M on any of these lists. They sure think that they are a blue blood but no one else does. 

GO BIG RED!!!
Click to expand...
Texas A&M is the biggest underachieving program in college football history with the resources they have.  That's the only list they should be on.  1 conference title in the Big XII and a big bunch of jack squat in the SEC.  Fake military cadets, fake football program.

 
Anyone else a little surprised satterfield didn’t get a pay cut? They released some of salaries but nothing on satt. No wonder the guy stuck around. OC $$ to coach TEs. Wish I had a friend like Rhule 

 
Huskers93-97 said:
Anyone else a little surprised satterfield didn’t get a pay cut? They released some of salaries but nothing on satt. No wonder the guy stuck around. OC $$ to coach TEs. Wish I had a friend like Rhule 
Click to expand...
Coaches, including Satterfield, were guaranteed the money, so cannot cut his pay that's already under contract.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top