I moved this out of the thread to keep the other thread on course.I get this isn’t the narrative many will accept, however, a female ref shared with me a few years back how she was encouraged (by another minority official in college football) to officiate football because she would be better than the current female refs. Said how the females in college at the time were not promoted on merit.
I don't think a single second-hand anecdote is justification for judging professional referees by their gender nor is it substance enough to imply it's evidence of a systemic, non-merit based promotional pipeline. If we're going to critique refs, let's do it on actual performance (missed calls, mechanics, positioning), not gender. Until then, the latter is largely just stereotyping which is why the argument I am I positioned was weak in the first place.