Look we all know player safety is the most important thing. CTE and brain injuries are becoming more understood, and it is now apparent that cumulative contact to the head is a contributor not just the severe blows.
In order to change the violent culture of college football, the NCAA in consultation with its attorneys, instituted a penalty called "targeting" and implemented severe consequences for any player flagged for "targeting".
However we still see concussions and total player safety is not yet assured. Obviously the goal is total player safety along with reduced liability for Universities and lucrative revenue streams.
So in order to ensure these things I believe we need to go further. I propose a new penalty to complement the "targeting" foul. There are times when a player, usually a defensive player lowers their head while flying into the play, and TRIES to target the player but MISSES. However their intent to cause harm is clear. So we should inhibit this behavior with a new infraction called "Attempted Targeting". The penalty for Attempted Targeting will be the same as the penalty for actual "targeting" after all, damage could have been done and we must inhibit this behavior.
"Attempted Targeting" infractions can be booth- initiated by conference officials at a remote site. To be sure that the reviews are thorough, each "Attempted Targeting foul should be reviewed for at least 4 minutes, allowing our Sponsors an additional 8-16 minutes per game of advertising.
The Universities, advertisers, and media will all make more money and players will be safer to boot! I think this is a great idea, what say you?
In order to change the violent culture of college football, the NCAA in consultation with its attorneys, instituted a penalty called "targeting" and implemented severe consequences for any player flagged for "targeting".
However we still see concussions and total player safety is not yet assured. Obviously the goal is total player safety along with reduced liability for Universities and lucrative revenue streams.
So in order to ensure these things I believe we need to go further. I propose a new penalty to complement the "targeting" foul. There are times when a player, usually a defensive player lowers their head while flying into the play, and TRIES to target the player but MISSES. However their intent to cause harm is clear. So we should inhibit this behavior with a new infraction called "Attempted Targeting". The penalty for Attempted Targeting will be the same as the penalty for actual "targeting" after all, damage could have been done and we must inhibit this behavior.
"Attempted Targeting" infractions can be booth- initiated by conference officials at a remote site. To be sure that the reviews are thorough, each "Attempted Targeting foul should be reviewed for at least 4 minutes, allowing our Sponsors an additional 8-16 minutes per game of advertising.
The Universities, advertisers, and media will all make more money and players will be safer to boot! I think this is a great idea, what say you?