BornRedCornFed
Five-Star Recruit
i think the people who are ranking crouch #2 or 3 need to go back and rewatch the 2001 season...
I don't see how Crouch isn't far-and-away the best on the list. If he'd have even been a career backup QB in the NFL, nobody would be downplaying the fact that he won the Heisman. Maybe there were more deserving candidates than him, but c'mon, the other Husker QBs within the past decade didn't even get a sniff of the Heisman. Deserved or not, Eric won it.i think the people who are ranking crouch #2 or 3 need to go back and rewatch the 2001 season...
He is no doubt. The only reason he holds the 1A on my list, it that Z. Taylor meant quite a bit in the Callahan years, for him to give NU 2 solid years at Qb gave a "little" hope to fans that Callahan was the right choice and the WCO might succeed. Plus for a kid to come from Juco to Big 12 newcomer of the year is pretty sweet also. We may never see a performance like Crouch gave us in 2000. Like another guy pointed out that it was hard to rank Qb's with all the changes made, but that is why I made the ranking, each of them brought something to the table that either worked or didn't, and that is why i thought it was good idea to see where other fans put each one.I don't see how Crouch isn't far-and-away the best on the list. If he'd have even been a career backup QB in the NFL, nobody would be downplaying the fact that he won the Heisman. Maybe there were more deserving candidates than him, but c'mon, the other Husker QBs within the past decade didn't even get a sniff of the Heisman. Deserved or not, Eric won it.i think the people who are ranking crouch #2 or 3 need to go back and rewatch the 2001 season...
:yeah1. Eric Crouch
2a. Zac Taylor
2b. Joey Ganz
4. Taylor Martinez
5. Jammal Lord
6. Sam Keller
7. Zac Lee
9. Joe Dailey
I didn't include Green because he has only started a handful of games
I wasn't hanging around this board last year...BUT...I would bet my last dollar that most on here - if not all - were saying Zac Lee was the second coming of Joe Montana...or something like it....after 3 games last year...and deservedly so! He looked like an animal - and was in fact - incredibly effective during that time frame! And what about MO on Thursday night?i also wouldnt put lee ahead of martinez, and i know i may be causing controversy by say that.
even an uninjured zac lee wasnt effective at any part of the 2009 season. at least taylor gave our offense a spark. some people are saying that we should have gone back to him while taylor was struggling, but i they must not remember how ineffective our offense was last year
:clap let's not forget those losers! :lol:1. Josh Freeman - based on his NFL production
2. Blane Gabbert - based on going to be a first round pick in April
3. Tyler Gabbert - based on solely nothing...other than bloodlines
4. Harrison Beck - He did help beat KSU on a pass interference call in endzone
5. Curt Dukes - based on his success at ....um...um..um
oh wait, I read the headline wrong.... You meant....oh crap...sorry..
Zac was hurt very, very early on in 2009. He hurt himself and then worsened the injury by playing through it all before the OOC slate was wrapped up.i also wouldnt put lee ahead of martinez, and i know i may be causing controversy by say that.
even an uninjured zac lee wasnt effective at any part of the 2009 season. at least taylor gave our offense a spark. some people are saying that we should have gone back to him while taylor was struggling, but i they must not remember how ineffective our offense was last year