Kolarevik appears to be another good off season get. Jackson is simply a beast. Wonder if he couldn't simply bulldoze a guy or 3 on passing downs. Or blow up the OL on FG attempts.
Serious question here, while his numbers are impressive, is that simply an impressive feat by this kid alone or is this an indictment of where the rest of the roster still is? I notice 4 walk ons in the top ten list and only a couple of offensive players. Lots of defensive guys which seems to line up exactly with how the team looked last year.Phalen Sanford needs to be on the field somewhere this fall. Maybe it’s as a special teams beast, but that athleticism cannot ride the pine.
Serious question here, while his numbers are impressive, is that simply an impressive feat by this kid alone or is this an indictment of where the rest of the roster still is? I notice 4 walk ons in the top ten list and only a couple of offensive players. Lots of defensive guys which seems to line up exactly with how the team looked last year.
Jackson too, I had included Reimer and left off Gifford. Good explanation about the rest. I guess my observation here would be more about the number of defensive players versus offensive, but that trends towards which side of the ball is ahead right now I suppose. Athletic ability doesn't specifically correlate to football performance of course but it surely won't hurt.Are your four walk-ons Sanford, Martin, Reimer and Gifford? Martin was a four-star recruit. The part that we got him as a walk-on has nothing to do with his lack of athletic ability. Reimer and Gifford were both recruited heavily by this staff but they were able to convince them to come into the program as walk-ons with the promise of getting a scholarship after they got here to be able to give scholarship offers to other players we were trying to get from farther away. Sanford is really the only guy who is a traditional walk-on. And he is a college heptathlete.
Jackson too, I had included Reimer and left off Gifford. Good explanation about the rest. I guess my observation here would be more about the number of defensive players versus offensive, but that trends towards which side of the ball is ahead right now I suppose. Athletic ability doesn't specifically correlate to football performance of course but it surely won't hurt.
I wouldn't be surprised if during the 90s run the defensive side of the ball had many of the best athletes as well.Serious question here, while his numbers are impressive, is that simply an impressive feat by this kid alone or is this an indictment of where the rest of the roster still is? I notice 4 walk ons in the top ten list and only a couple of offensive players. Lots of defensive guys which seems to line up exactly with how the team looked last year.
With the way the rules are written you honestly need it to be that way for a chance to be good.I wouldn't be surprised if during the 90s run the defensive side of the ball had many of the best athletes as well.
Agreed.With the way the rules are written you honestly need it to be that way for a chance to be good.
Sanford seems to have had quite the career in HS with football/track. State champion in track. Be interesting to see if he can get on the field in some capacity. I know folks mention ST, but his scores are pretty legit.....
Sanford seems to have had quite the career in HS with football/track. State champion in track. Be interesting to see if he can get on the field in some capacity. I know folks mention ST, but his scores are pretty legit.....