In a just world, winning 9 games a year would be more than suitable. And the people that want to parade his achievements higher than needed point to just that. However if you look under the surface there was almost as much nonsensical losses and blowouts and missed opportunity as Riley. Bo just didn't lose to Illinois and Purdue while he was employed. So yeah, his record looks better because he beat teams that he should beat. Riley couldn't do that. So I go back to my original comparison, would you rather get hit by a train or a car?