I Backs back

T

Twodocs

Special Teams Player
I wonder if Watson and TO have some new option plays to use some of Bo's new weapons. I bet TO would have some fun with these guys when it comes to Suh and Cody and Burkhead and his recievers! Any observations so far? :moreinteresting :koolaid2:

 
Twodocs said:
I wonder if Watson and TO have some new option plays to use some of Bo's new weapons. I bet TO would have some fun with these guys when it comes to Suh and Cody and Burkhead and his recievers! Any observations so far? :moreinteresting :koolaid2:
Click to expand...
tufftiger?

 
The term I-back was never dropped, even though the FB took on a lesser role under BC. I think that staff thought that if they said the RBs were I-backs and then kept Turner around, people would think that tradition was being honored. How lame is that?

 
It did seem we had trouble, down at the goal line, before Cody ran it in. It doesn't seem that we have a true full back, or at least one that's getting playing time. Call them what you want, I/back, running back,or half back we still need that big body type down near the goal line. That was not a big line they were going against, compared to what they will be seeing. IMO

GBR!!!

 
huskered17 said:
It did seem we had trouble, down at the goal line, before Cody ran it in. It doesn't seem that we have a true full back, or at least one that's getting playing time. Call them what you want, I/back, running back,or half back we still need that big body type down near the goal line. That was not a big line they were going against, compared to what they will be seeing. IMO

GBR!!!
Click to expand...
I agree... from what Wats said this morning at the breakfast, he called Lester Ward their "thumper" back. So maybe LW gets some touches this weekend?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top