I think we should play...

master

Walk-on
All of these teams have the lead on us by the amount listed.

Texas 4

Oklahoma 7

Alabama 1

Arizona 1

Arkansas 1

Clemson 1 (play in 2009)

Stanford 1

Duke 1

Georgia tech 1

Houston 1

Michigan 1

Mississippi 1

Penn state 1

Purdue 1

USC 2

Ohio state 2

Syracuse 2

Indiana 2

Washington state 2

Florida state 4

Minnesota 9

Pittsburg 9

Obviously we play two of these teams each year and we are already going to play clemson, but I think the huskers should play the rest of these teams multiple times so that there will be no teams with a winning record over us. I want to start by playing Duke and Houston since its embarrassing to say they have a winning record over us.

 
i thought it was quite clear that he was talking about head to head record. they have won that many more than us in the series....

 
you all know what he means. ;)

be careful, you could catch hell for being too "nitpicky"

:rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin

 
All of these teams have the lead on us by the amount listed.

Texas 4

Oklahoma 7

Alabama 1

Arizona 1

Arkansas 1

Clemson 1 (play in 2009)

Stanford 1

Duke 1

Georgia tech 1

Houston 1

Michigan 1

Mississippi 1

Penn state 1

Purdue 1

USC 2

Ohio state 2

Syracuse 2

Indiana 2

Washington state 2

Florida state 4

Minnesota 9

Pittsburg 9

Obviously we play two of these teams each year and we are already going to play clemson, but I think the huskers should play the rest of these teams multiple times so that there will be no teams with a winning record over us. I want to start by playing Duke and Houston since its embarrassing to say they have a winning record over us.
I guess you don't know a F**KING thing about scheduling, but if you come up with the $1,000,000 guarentee to get them and the $300,000 BUYOUT to get them out of their non-conference games that are already scheduled .... by all means HANDLE IT!!!!!!!!
 
first, in order to determine the thought pattern of the myopic mind, and exact some focal clearity, one has to consider the heat of the meat, and the angle of the dangle, considering the mass of the a$$ is constant.... and... ughh.., what was he saying???

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top