I think we should play...

zE bOp said:
jayhawk said:
Opponent Win Loss Tie Pct. PF PA Delta

Adrian (MI) 1 0 0 1.00000 41 0 41

Air Force (CO) 1 1 0 0.50000 40 34 6

Akron (OH) 1 0 0 1.00000 59 14 45

Alabama 2 3 0 0.40000 107 123 -16

Alabama-Birmingham 1 0 0 1.00000 38 7 31

Arizona 0 1 1 0.25000 34 37 -3

Arizona St. 6 2 0 0.75000 284 151 133

Arkansas 0 1 0 0.00000 7 10 -3

Army (NY) 3 2 0 0.60000 122 71 51

Auburn (AL) 3 1 0 0.75000 85 34 51

Baker (KS) 0 0 1 0.50000 10 10 0

Ball St. (IN) 1 0 0 1.00000 41 40 1

Baylor (TX) 10 1 0 0.90909 390 125 265

Bellevue College (NE) 3 0 0 1.00000 184 0 184

Butte AC (MT) 0 2 0 0.00000 12 36 -24

California 3 0 0 1.00000 105 29 76

Camp Dodge (IA) 0 1 0 0.00000 7 23 -16

Carlisle Indian School (PA) 0 1 0 0.00000 6 37 -31

Central Florida 1 0 0 1.00000 38 24 14

Chicago (IL) 1 1 0 0.50000 33 45 -12

Cincinnati (OH) 1 0 0 1.00000 41 0 41

Clemson (SC) 0 1 0 0.00000 15 22 -7

Colgate (NY) 1 0 0 1.00000 35 7 28

Colorado 47 18 2 0.71642 1732 1068 664

Colorado St. 6 0 0 1.00000 281 50 231

Creighton (NE) 3 0 0 1.00000 158 0 158

Denver (CO) 4 0 0 1.00000 106 5 101

Denver AC (CO) 3 1 0 0.75000 31 36 -5

Doane (NE) 16 2 0 0.88889 540 41 499

Drake (IA) 6 2 0 0.75000 152 39 113

Duke (NC) 0 1 0 0.00000 7 34 -27

Florida 2 0 0 1.00000 75 34 41

Florida St. 2 6 0 0.25000 170 183 -13

Fort Omaha Balloon School (NE) 1 0 0 1.00000 19 0 19

Georgia 1 0 0 1.00000 45 6 39

Georgia Tech 0 1 0 0.00000 21 45 -24

Grand Island College (NE) 4 0 0 1.00000 222 0 222

Grinnell (IA) 7 2 0 0.77778 226 45 181

Haskell Institute (KS) 7 2 0 0.77778 250 46 204

Hastings (NE) 1 0 0 1.00000 76 0 76

Hawaii 5 1 0 0.83333 256 38 218

Houston (TX) 0 1 0 0.00000 14 17 -3

Illinois 7 2 1 0.75000 221 109 112

Indiana 7 9 3 0.44737 318 367 -49

Iowa 26 12 3 0.67073 667 420 247

Iowa Navy Pre-Flight 0 1 0 0.00000 0 46 -46

Iowa St. 85 16 2 0.83495 2649 1066 1583

Kansas 89 23 3 0.78696 2918 1179 1739

Kansas City Medical (MO) 1 2 2 0.40000 12 58 -46

Kansas St. 76 15 2 0.82796 2575 989 1586

Kirksville Osteopath (MO) 1 0 0 1.00000 5 0 5

Knox (IL) 5 0 0 1.00000 124 5 119

Lincoln HS (NE) 8 0 0 1.00000 140 6 134

Lincoln Medical College (NE) 1 0 0 1.00000 29 0 29

Louisiana St. 5 0 1 0.91667 112 70 42

Louisiana Tech 2 0 0 1.00000 105 37 68

Maine 1 0 0 1.00000 25 7 18

McNeese St. (LA) 1 0 0 1.00000 38 14 24

Miami (FL) 5 5 0 0.50000 182 224 -42

Michigan 2 3 1 0.41667 86 125 -39

Michigan St. 5 0 0 1.00000 181 34 147

Middle Tennessee St. 1 0 0 1.00000 48 7 41

Minnesota 20 29 2 0.41176 810 817 -7

Mississippi 0 1 0 0.00000 23 27 -4

Mississippi St. 1 0 0 1.00000 31 17 14

Missouri 63 36 3 0.63235 2251 1435 816

Montana St. 2 0 0 1.00000 79 13 66

Morningside (IA) 1 0 0 1.00000 34 7 27

Nebraska Alumni 0 0 1 0.50000 0 0 0

Nebraska Wesleyan 8 0 0 1.00000 305 15 290

Nebraska-Kearney 1 0 0 1.00000 117 0 117

Nevada 1 0 0 1.00000 52 10 42

Nevada-Las Vegas 1 0 0 1.00000 48 6 42

New Mexico 1 0 0 1.00000 38 7 31

New Mexico St. 3 0 0 1.00000 163 7 156

New York (NY) 2 0 0 1.00000 42 25 17

Nicholls St. (LA) 1 0 0 1.00000 56 7 49

North Carolina 1 0 0 1.00000 21 17 4

North Carolina St. 2 0 0 1.00000 50 28 22

North Dakota 1 0 0 1.00000 33 0 33

North Texas 1 0 0 1.00000 76 14 62

Northern Illinois 2 0 0 1.00000 108 31 77

Northwestern (IL) 3 1 0 0.75000 134 43 91

Notre Dame (IN) 8 7 1 0.53125 201 238 -37

Ohio St. 0 2 0 0.00000 27 62 -35

Oklahoma 37 44 3 0.45833 1391 1666 -275

Oklahoma St. 36 5 1 0.86905 1245 558 687

Omaha University Club (NE) 1 0 0 1.00000 36 0 36

Omaha YMCA (NE) 3 0 0 1.00000 56 6 50

Oregon 5 1 0 0.83333 246 61 185

Oregon St. 9 2 0 0.81818 229 123 106

Ottawa (KS) 1 0 0 1.00000 6 0 6

Pacific (CA) 2 0 0 1.00000 119 28 91

Penn St. 6 7 0 0.46154 227 211 16

Peru St. (NE) 3 0 0 1.00000 139 0 139

Pittsburgh (PA) 6 15 3 0.31250 144 320 -176

Purdue (IN) 0 1 0 0.00000 0 28 -28

Rice (TX) 1 0 0 1.00000 48 3 45

Rutgers (NJ) 1 0 0 1.00000 28 0 28

Saint Louis (MO) 0 1 0 0.00000 0 34 -34

San Jose St. (CA) 2 0 0 1.00000 84 25 59

Sioux City AC (IA) 1 0 0 1.00000 38 0 38

South Carolina 3 0 0 1.00000 85 51 34

South Dakota 14 1 2 0.88235 536 45 491

South Dakota St. 1 0 0 1.00000 58 7 51

Southern California 0 3 1 0.12500 83 129 -46

Southern Methodist (TX) 1 0 1 0.75000 21 14 7

Southern Mississippi 2 1 0 0.66667 75 48 27

Stanford (CA) 0 1 0 0.00000 13 21 -8

Syracuse (NY) 5 7 0 0.41667 146 154 -8

Tarkio (MO) 3 0 0 1.00000 45 0 45

Tennessee 2 0 0 1.00000 73 38 35

Texas 4 8 0 0.33333 220 231 -11

Texas A&M 10 3 0 0.76923 361 204 157

Texas Christian 6 1 0 0.85714 225 83 142

Texas Tech 7 3 0 0.70000 341 252 89

Troy (AL) 4 0 0 1.00000 159 30 129

UCLA 6 4 0 0.60000 289 199 90

Utah 4 0 0 1.00000 177 61 116

Utah St. 8 0 0 1.00000 358 100 258

Virginia Tech 1 1 0 0.50000 71 56 15

Wabash (IN) 1 0 0 1.00000 27 6 21

Wake Forest (NC) 3 0 0 1.00000 87 32 55

Washburn (KS) 4 0 0 1.00000 94 7 87

Washington 3 3 1 0.50000 146 109 37

Washington (MO) 1 1 0 0.50000 27 26 1

Washington St. 1 3 0 0.25000 77 95 -18

West Virginia 1 0 0 1.00000 31 0 31

Western Illinois 1 0 0 1.00000 56 17 39

Western Michigan 1 0 0 1.00000 47 24 23

William Jewell (MO) 1 0 0 1.00000 38 0 38

Wisconsin 3 2 0 0.60000 108 58 50

Wyoming 5 0 0 1.00000 203 69 134

Totals 825 337 41 0.70283 29562 15384 14178
Click to expand...
Well, that clears up everything!
Click to expand...
Watch what you write

Some people might say your being a douche- or "The jerkstore called and they're running out of you"

 
HuskerInLostWages said:
IveAbigN said:
HuskerInLostWages said:
Maybe i'm missing something or it was edited, but it was pretty easy to understand what he was saying.

With the responses given to this new guy, I had to do a double take to see if I was on ESPN's forums again because I've yet to see anyone treat others like that here. Do you guys really want this place to be just like that craphole? Way to make an impression on someone trying to get a feel for you guys and way to make someone feel welcome.
Click to expand...
lighten up Francis.

I think everyone knew what he meant after doing a double take. Seems like most people were having a little fun with it. That's what makes a sight interesting.

Now move along, nothing to see here
Click to expand...
Actually if I wanted to be surrounded by d-bags I could have stayed at ESPN or any other numerous NU board/forums. If you think it's ok to just be a jerk to new comers maybe you should check your priorities. I guess my dad taught me to be a leader and not a follower so i'm standing up for the new guy, not following the rest of the crowd and being a douche.
Click to expand...

Wash the sand out of your Va Jay Jay, have a scotch and calm down.

 
maybe some people will start commenting on the topic at this point.....well, I guess South Bay Husker about covered it.

 
Last edited:
If you are trying to erase teams form the list, I vote for the vollowing ones as best targets to play asap....

Arizona 1 - Soft right now

Arkansas 1 - Very soft by their standards

Stanford 1 - Soft in general

Duke 1 - Stay puff marshmellow man soft all the time

Houston 1 - Art Briles is gone, and they were not great when he was there...

Michigan 1 - This season was a good chance, each year should get tougher

Purdue 1 - I think you can get these guys most of the time, but now is one of them

Syracuse 2 - 4 seasons in a row with no more than 4 wins, the 3 years before that they were mediocre (2 games under .500) but before that the last losing season was... 1986. Not too bad, they are soft now, I would want them now.

Indiana 2 - Perpetually soft

Washington state 2 - Train wreck, get in on that soon

Florida state 4 - Well, they are not bad, but more beatable now than they used to be

Minnesota 9 - YEAH! KUs bowl opponent. I predict we run these guys, an it is not my nature to do that.... Play em if you can!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow, this really could have been a cool thread....

should we just try to break even, or should we shoot for the lead in these series?

i could go either way, but it'd be fun to be 1up on a few of these teams...

 
SouthBayHusker said:
master said:
All of these teams have the lead on us by the amount listed.

Texas 4

Oklahoma 7

Alabama 1

Arizona 1

Arkansas 1

Clemson 1 (play in 2009)

Stanford 1

Duke 1

Georgia tech 1

Houston 1

Michigan 1

Mississippi 1

Penn state 1

Purdue 1

USC 2

Ohio state 2

Syracuse 2

Indiana 2

Washington state 2

Florida state 4

Minnesota 9

Pittsburg 9

Obviously we play two of these teams each year and we are already going to play clemson, but I think the huskers should play the rest of these teams multiple times so that there will be no teams with a winning record over us. I want to start by playing Duke and Houston since its embarrassing to say they have a winning record over us.
Click to expand...
I guess you don't know a F**KING thing about scheduling, but if you come up with the $1,000,000 guarentee to get them and the $300,000 BUYOUT to get them out of their non-conference games that are already scheduled .... by all means HANDLE IT!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

seriously. what's the big deal?? why treat the guy like garbage for posing this? IT'S A MESSAGE BOARD FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!! What else are we supposed to do? Breakdown the Clemson game like the "experts" we all are for the next 2 weeks? And what about after that? I don't think the University would blink an eye if one of these teams wanted to play... it's not that big of a deal to em... plus, most teams are NOT booked for the next 10 years already. Sure, 1 or 2 big games a year may be, but after that, no, they aren't... no buyouts would be needed. RELAX.

 
SouthBayHusker said:
master said:
All of these teams have the lead on us by the amount listed.

Texas 4

Oklahoma 7

Alabama 1

Arizona 1

Arkansas 1

Clemson 1 (play in 2009)

Stanford 1

Duke 1

Georgia tech 1

Houston 1

Michigan 1

Mississippi 1

Penn state 1

Purdue 1

USC 2

Ohio state 2

Syracuse 2

Indiana 2

Washington state 2

Florida state 4

Minnesota 9

Pittsburg 9

Obviously we play two of these teams each year and we are already going to play clemson, but I think the huskers should play the rest of these teams multiple times so that there will be no teams with a winning record over us. I want to start by playing Duke and Houston since its embarrassing to say they have a winning record over us.
Click to expand...
I guess you don't know a F**KING thing about scheduling, but if you come up with the $1,000,000 guarentee to get them and the $300,000 BUYOUT to get them out of their non-conference games that are already scheduled .... by all means HANDLE IT!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
wow dude uncalled for the guy was just simply pointing out that these are the teams that maybe Bo should schedule in the future like in 2012 and 2013 where we sill have open slots.....u need to chill and not be such a @ss.

 
all I said was, what. If that qualifies me as a d-bag so be it. Anywho, I really want to play West Virginia for some reason, don't know why, just wanted to for the longest time now.

 
borNred said:
all I said was, what. If that qualifies me as a d-bag so be it. Anywho, I really want to play West Virginia for some reason, don't know why, just wanted to for the longest time now.
Click to expand...
I think the last time we played WV we whooped up on them in the Kickoff Classic with Touchdown Tommie.

It actually looks do-able to even up the score with most of these teams, just might take 30 yrs to do it is all.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top