This kind of plays in to a question I've been pondering...how do you guys see Big Ten defenses compared to those of the Big XII. Just looking at the numbers....they're quite striking. I think Big 10 teams would do better than we give them credit against some of these teams.
Big Ten Defenses
Average Defensive rank - 43
Median Defensive rank - 26
Best Defense- 3 (MSU)
Worst Defense- 107 (Indiana)
Teams above 100 - 1
Teams in the top 10- 4
Teams in the top 25- 6
Big XII Defenses
Average Defensive rank - 84
Median Defensive rank - 90
Best Defense- 14 (Texas)
Worst Defense- 120 (Kansas)
Teams above 100 - 4
Teams in the top 10- 0
Teams in the top 25- 1
Bah...give the teams in the Big 12 and extra non-conference game like the Big 10 has and everybody in the conference could be padding their defensive stats against powerhouses like McNeese State too.
Of course the defensive stats are better in the Big 10...you get to play against juggernaut offenses like Penn State...or Iowa....or Indiana. How do you think the numbers would look if you had to play OSU...OU...KSU...Baylor? Not so good.
The Big 10 is good at mediocrity competiting against mediocrity and running up big numbers against the members who are less than mediocre, getting decent bowl bids based on records by people who actually never see the games, and then getting pummeled by opponents from real football conferences.
But hey...the money is great!