How many of these threads are you going to start? We get it. You love you some Imani Cross. You are not alone.
Two coaching staffs seem to see him as exactly what he is.
Just out of curiosity, why do members seem to get put off when someone starts another thread with a similar subject? the old ones get buried so fast. It really makes no difference to me but have been wondering why that is a pet peeve of some. BTW, I'm not meaning to come down on anyone if that's how they feel, just would like to understand the frustration.
It all depends on the topic and how thoroughly it's been discussed. There's also a measure of how cluttered you want the board to get with specific discussions. If there's nothing new to add to a thread, then why start a new one about the same subject? If there's a thread already existence, why didn't someone search for it and post in there?
That's the generic answer. It's all very case-by-case. I'm not being condescending with this next part of my post, I promise - I'm just offering up my own perspective. As someone who has been a regular contributor here since 2008, the 'why isn't Imani Cross seeing more playing time' discussion is one of the most dead-beaten horses on this board. Multiple threads have had several discussions regarding this topic and it's been analyzed from just about every angle imaginable.
So, the question becomes, what value is gained from starting another thread about it? All it ends up doing is rehashing old arguments about as stimulating as stapling your ears to the floor, all while pushing other, fresher, more engaging content off the front page and into the board's black hole where threads don't get near as much traffic.
