BigRedBuster
Well-known member
[No message]
Yep, it's a start.Now do Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica
Yeah, this sounds pretty stupid and is likely not true. Investigate it, sure. But it is almost certainly untrue.
As for "abolish ICE", any Democrat running on that message or any pushing that message within the party deserves to lose. It is not only a dumb idea, but it will also cost them elections in an environment where they already play at a massive disadvantage.
My basis is predicated entirely on elections. "Abolish ICE" is an idea that would cost Democrats more than "Defund the Police" in 2020. Their electoral position is already in a catastrophic place for the foreseeable future, there is no need to intentionally step on an Electoral landmine with "abolish ICE" in their platform.I agree that it can easily cost them elections, but why is it a dumb idea?
It was founded in 2003. Was America some lawless hellscape before then?
As for the agency itself, I don't have much of an opinion. Pre-2003 it wasn't different, they simply combined several offices and agencies under a larger, unified structure. Missions served by INS moved to the new ICE and so on. Abolishing it wouldn't accomplish anything. The mission would simply be passed onto other DHS agencies, like CBP, TSA or USCIS.
I think it's a case of Dems messaging poorly and/or the voters not understanding the actual policy or implications. Instead of "abolish ICE" they could run on "restore CBP" (or something better), which could be functionally the same but would poll better.My basis is predicated entirely on elections. "Abolish ICE" is an idea that would cost Democrats more than "Defund the Police" in 2020. Their electoral position is already in a catastrophic place for the foreseeable future, there is no need to intentionally step on an Electoral landmine with "abolish ICE" in their platform.
As for the agency itself, I don't have much of an opinion. Pre-2003 it wasn't different, they simply combined several offices and agencies under a larger, unified structure. Missions served by INS moved to the new ICE and so on. Abolishing it wouldn't accomplish anything. The mission would simply be passed onto other DHS agencies, like CBP, TSA or USCIS.
I'm just trying to imagine what would happen in red states in the USA if a Dem POTUS candidate went around burning Bibles at his/her campaign appearances...Mass Immigration, especially from the Middle East, is never a good idea. Poor Sweden meant well.
Tell me you're bigoted with out really telling me you're bigoted.Mass Immigration, especially from the Middle East, is never a good idea. Poor Sweden meant well.
Mass Immigration, especially from the Middle East, is never a good idea.
Because our elites refuse to talk about the Islamist problem
My favorite student I've had this year (out of 593) is an immigrant from Afghanistan. And she was fasting for Ramadan, so it's safe to assume she is Muslim...Nebraska has a pretty sizable immigrant population from the Middle East. They work in our packing plants where Whites won't work. They are good people and good neighbors. I'm not really sure a riot half the world away changes any of that.
What does this even mean? Who are "our elites?"
What is "the Islamist problem?" Is that anything like Hitler's "Jewish problem?"
Be careful reporting news in the world. This is sensitive material, especially for some of the self-proclaimed non-christians on this board, who have openly slammed the door closed on Christianity, but will speak kindly on behalf of muslim culture, people and their religion.Mass Immigration, especially from the Middle East, is never a good idea. Poor Sweden meant well.