tschu
Banned
Yeeeep.I'm quite certain we don't need to rehash the 9-10 win thing in yet another thread. But for a short explanation, it's how we lose those four games, how we barely win a couple against lesser opponents, and the relative level of competition we have been doing it with. 9 or 10 wins DOES seem like a good stat.......until you look at the games in detail, then not so much imo.TheSker said:It's hard to call 9-10 wins per season "subpar". It may not be "excellent" (in all areas)......but "subpar"?JJHusker1 said:They are not an excuse for subpar performance.
I'm with you in that more than two losses with our schedule seems pretty bad. But my expectation for the season is at least 4-5 losses. And that was before these injuries, so I'll solidly say 5. So right off the bat, my expectations don't line up with what I feel would be acceptable. Now I've been with the Fire Bo camp since UCLA last season, and I feel like us meeting expectations based on the strength of the current team shouldn't be a long-term determiner of whether a coach keeps his job. There should be a benchmark baseline of success that includes minimizing blowouts, competing for and winning conference championships, etc.
Will this change how I evaluate Bo at the end of the season? I'll take it into consideration, but if that means these injuries were the difference between 4 and 5 losses, and we get blown out by Wisconsin, Michigan State, and Iowa, then it certainly won't matter. We "met" the low, safe 8-9 win expectation, but failed to come close to the benchmark. If we win 9-10 games with a really bad secondary, then I might change my tune. If we play in the B1GCCG despite the losses, then Bo gets some credit there. But I'll make it clear that this team is going to have to do a lot for me to change my tune on Bo.
Betting market seems to think that these defensive losses were worth about 0.3 or 0.4 wins, so it certainly seems at least measurably significant.