huskerfan92
All-Conference
According to Rivals, Bray said Marcus Newby will be starting in place of MRI, with Gifford having more of a role in nickel and dime packages.
yep, less than 4 weeks. You noticed Wisky schedule? Easy-peasy. No Michigan St and Ohio St.Sucks about MRI. He was going to be a big player for us against Wisconsin and Minny.
How does Wisconsin get away with that? Meanwhile we will have Ohio State or Michigan St on our schedule through 2019...in 2018 we have bothyep, less than 4 weeks. You noticed Wisky schedule? Easy-peasy. No Michigan St and Ohio St.Sucks about MRI. He was going to be a big player for us against Wisconsin and Minny.
And no bye week until November 21st. (Huskers sked).
![]()
Killer schedule in 2016.How does Wisconsin get away with that? Meanwhile we will have Ohio State or Michigan St on our schedule through 2019...in 2018 we have both
We can lose to MSU as long as we beat whoever we may tie in the division, whether that be Wisconsin/Northwestern/Iowa/Minnesota. We would own the tiebreaker, head to head. We could even get in with 2 conference losses.Seriously?
So to win the B1G West, it's either win out (including Michigan State), or beat everybody except for Michigan State and hope that Wisconsin loses to I guess Northwestern or something.
Gosh. At least there's a snowball's chance that Wiscy accommodates this year, right? Although Northwestern (ranked?!) and Iowa both also avoid the two B1G titans this year.
If you have the same conference record it comes down to who won the head to head matchup.We can only lose to MSU if nobody else runs the table. This seems plausible, if those not great teams who avoid MSU and OSU all lose at least one game. They might all lose at least two. But if Nebraska loses two and one of those teams are also 6-2 and beats Nebraska, then we should lose the tiebreaker, right?
And that'd be fair. It's just the margin of error is very slim, and it's not because those other teams are great or anything. It just seems pretty possible for at least a couple of them to be at least 6-2 in conference.
If we lose to MSU and another team runs the table, then they would have beaten us too to gives us two losses. So it wouldn't matter anyway.We can only lose to MSU if nobody else runs the table. This seems plausible, if those not great teams who avoid MSU and OSU all lose at least one game. They might all lose at least two. But if Nebraska loses two and one of those teams are also 6-2 and beats Nebraska, then we should lose the tiebreaker, right?
And that'd be fair. It's just the margin of error is very slim, and it's not because those other teams are great or anything. It just seems pretty possible for at least a couple of them to be at least 6-2 in conference.
High ankle sprain plagued Martinez. I would prefer him sit another week to get ready for conference play.Still no VV at practice today.
It was much more that plagued Martinez than a high ankle sprain. But, I agree that I would sit him as much as you can to get him over it for conference play.High ankle sprain plagued Martinez. I would prefer him sit another week to get ready for conference play.Still no VV at practice today.
I thought I read that he said he didn't do any concussion protocol during the game. I don't think he would have had time to do anything extensive considering how quickly he came back in. Perhaps they did after the game.Reilly mentioned "good test scores." I presume that means they gave him the concussion tests? I would hope so, but I hadn't heard anything.
I think everyone was shocked he came back in the game only a couple of plays after that huge hit he took, when he went down on the turf. Glad to see there's no issue.