TheBugeater
New member
x
Last edited by a moderator:
Vince R. said:I think it is funny sometimes, but they're very grainy and outdated in reference. I thought the one thing the prior staff did right was the marketing. They killed it and set the bar.
Don't believe everything you read about the number of tackles he had last year, and his 25 tackle game against Scottsdale.
He's Husker now, so who cares!Don't believe everything you read about the number of tackles he had last year, and his 25 tackle game against Scottsdale.
Seems like an unFair claimDon't believe everything you read about the number of tackles he had last year, and his 25 tackle game against Scottsdale.
Seems like an unFair claim
I'll show myself out
no, stay.....
Right! The real thing to believe is what random internet message board posters write.Don't believe everything you read about the number of tackles he had last year, and his 25 tackle game against Scottsdale.
I beg to differ. What if this is your O-line:Impossible for a nose guard to have 25 tackles on 34 running plays.
I’m guessing your from Indiana?Pima stats are notoriously incorrect.
For example check out the stats for their last game against Mesa.
Pima credits their individual defensive players with a combined 170 tackles when Mesa ran only 76 plays. In that same game Mesa individuals were credited with 70 tackles (100 less than Pima) on almost the same number of plays.
Against Scottsdale, they credited Fair with 25 tackles (23 solo and 2 assist) and Scottsdale only ran 34 running plays. A complete tape of the game shows him making 3 solo, 2 assisted. His Scottsdale Hudl highlights show him making 3 tackles. Impossible for a nose guard to have 25 tackles on 34 running plays.