Vince from ShamWOW said:
huskersrule95 said:
Vince from ShamWOW said:
huskersrule95 said:
Vince from ShamWOW said:
Nice segment on Bridgette Root. It would be nice to see her get a shot at playng. However with her being a setter and the coaches daughter on the roster, her playing time looks less than....... even - equal.
It has nothing to do with Lauren Cook being the coaches daughter to why Bridgett Root wont play much, it is because Lauren Cook is really good and that is why she will play and not Root.
okay...... <_<
Lauren Cook last year at UCLA won AVCA National Freshman of Year. I am pretty sure that is pretty damn impressive of an award to get and means she is a very good player. There is probably reasons why Root is 3rd string right now, probably isnt as good as the other 2 setters that play and I am sure it has nothing to due with Cook being coaches daughter.
Sure thing Dan Hawkins. Even he saw the what's what. It' took him three years - but he finally got it. There's hope, so don't quite yet. With this stated, we can drop it now as there's nothing more to add.
Nice NU win. Not a great win, but a nice win.
Ignorant post of the month goes to you, Vince.
Saying that Cook isn't a great volleyball player is a joke. There is a reason she was one of the top girls coming out of high school and was the national freshman of the year last year. The girl is flat out a stud, and it has NOTHING to do with being Cook's daughter that she is seeing playing time. How is Cook starting even remotely close to Hawkins starting at QB for CU? Cook would be the starting setter on almost every team in the country, if not every. Hawkins would not start at QB for almost any team. But of course, you have to say there is nothing more to add because you have no proof what so ever to back up your ludicrous statement. Good effort, but you're way, WAY wrong.