Disagree. The NFL does not care what conference you played in. They care about your skill, talent, etc. Carson Wentz didn't even play at an FBS program and he's projected to be a first rounder, perhaps even first overall pick.As begrudging as it is to admit it, he does have a point. The SEC has had more players drafted the last 8 years than any of the Power 5 Conferences. The SEC label does carry weight at the next level.
The SEC led the nation's conferences in draft picks for the ninth consecutive year in 2015. The last time that the SEC did not top the conference draft list was in 2006, when the ACC had 52, the Big Ten had 41 and the SEC had 37. http://www.secsports.com/collection/12794214/sec-2015-nfl-draft
The SEC has had more NFL draft picks in recent years because they've had more talent. End of story.
What would be more interesting is to see the distribution across rounds.
If the perception when grading tape is that playing in the SEC is tougher and demonstrated competence in that conference is perceived as more meaningful than in other conferences, then having tape from the SEC may be the difference between being a late rounder versus a FA.
We can have a separate debate about whether it's better to be a 6th round pick or have the flexibility of free agency, but that's for another thread.
Another topic is that we need to find ways to counter that perception of the SEC is the best "pro breeding grounds," whether it's true or not, because it hurts in the HS recruiting too.
The "good" thing is that Harbaugh and Urban will probably help the B10 as a whole just as Saban and his "we've had 835 guys drafted from Alabama since I've been here, so come be #836" recruiting pitch has bolstered the perception that the entire SEC is a better place to go if you want to be an NFLer.