knapplc vs. Redux

knapplc said:
Like pretending wrestling is anything other than a soap opera for boys kind of pretend or some other kind of pretend?
Click to expand...


Pro wrestling is a soap opera.  But you shouldn't say it's for boys, that's offensive.  Sunday they just had the first all female PPV, so saying it's only for boys is pretty narrow minded.  I thought better of you than that.

And you're just trying to make a personal jab anyways.  That's the problem with you.  You take differing opinion too personally.  If not for that you would probably be one of my favorite people to discuss things with on the board.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
knapplc said:
Funny story. I told MC she was wrong about as often as I tell you that you're wrong. 
Click to expand...


Yeah but I'm not a transgender hero like MC is now apparently.

And by the way, still waiting for you to share that conversation we had where I came crying to you about people picking on me like you tried insinuating a while back.

 
Redux said:
Yeah but I'm not a transgender hero like MC is now apparently.

And by the way, still waiting for you to share that conversation we had where I came crying to you about people picking on me like you tried insinuating a while back.
Click to expand...


MC is nobody's hero. Not sure why you have to take shots like that.

I lost a ton of the PMs I had when I was a Mod.  My inbox went down to regular size when I retired, and it indiscriminately just axed a bunch of them. So let's just say I completely made that up, you were right, and I'm just a big old liar.  Fair? That's where you're going with this anyway, because of course I would lie about it because of course it matters enough to me to do that. But whatever.  I'm known to lie about stuff like that. 

And for the record, since I know it bugs you when people use the frowny face to reply to your posts, that isn't me, I don't use those things, and this one I can prove from a screen shot:

sV7Kt2f.png


 
knapplc said:
MC is nobody's hero. Not sure why you have to take shots like that.

I lost a ton of the PMs I had when I was a Mod.  My inbox went down to regular size when I retired, and it indiscriminately just axed a bunch of them. So let's just say I completely made that up, you were right, and I'm just a big old liar.  Fair? That's where you're going with this anyway, because of course I would lie about it because of course it matters enough to me to do that. But whatever.  I'm known to lie about stuff like that. 

And for the record, since I know it bugs you when people use the frowny face to reply to your posts, that isn't me, I don't use those things, and this one I can prove from a screen shot:

Click to expand...


It's expected when I disagree with you, not too worried about it honestly.

The conversation went along these lines.  A sock account was made to mock me.  The mods handled it which you were a part of, or maybe solely the handler.  I thanked you for it.  You said no biggie, it was a clear sock account made for mocking.  I said I didn't want people to get banned or anything because of it.  And that was about the jist ot it.

I'm sure you remember it differently.  Not shocking since you've come to the decision you're not a fan of mine.  I'm not calling you a liar, I'm just telling you how it really went down since you tried making me look like a b!^@h during a different disagreement.  Like I said above, you make too much s#!t personal.

 
Redux said:
It's expected when I disagree with you, not too worried about it honestly. 

The conversation went along these lines.  A sock account was made to mock me.  The mods handled it which you were a part of, or maybe solely the handler.  I thanked you for it.  You said no biggie, it was a clear sock account made for mocking.  I said I didn't want people to get banned or anything because of it.  And that was about the jist ot it. 

I'm sure you remember it differently.  Not shocking since you've come to the decision you're not a fan of mine.  I'm not calling you a liar, I'm just telling you how it really went down since you tried making me look like a b!^@h during a different disagreement.  Like I said above, you make too much s#!t personal. 
Click to expand...


That's about half of it.  I'm sure you remember it differently so you can be the hero of your story, and that's fine.  But don't pretend you were completely cool with it, and that you didn't complain about it, and that you didn't look for help, or that I didn't help you, tell everyone involved to stop mocking you for your belief (DOES THAT SOUND FAMILIAR RIGHT NOW?!?!?). 

And yeah, you can claim that I'm taking everything personally, and that's why we're not cool anymore.  Except that I haven't changed.  But whatever.

 
knapplc said:
That's about half of it.  I'm sure you remember it differently so you can be the hero of your story, and that's fine.  But don't pretend you were completely cool with it, and that you didn't complain about it, and that you didn't look for help, or that I didn't help you, tell everyone involved to stop mocking you for your belief (DOES THAT SOUND FAMILIAR RIGHT NOW?!?!?). 

And yeah, you can claim that I'm taking everything personally, and that's why we're not cool anymore.  Except that I haven't changed.  But whatever.
Click to expand...


The hero of the story, lmao.  I'm pretty sure you messaged me first regarding it.  St Paul was being an a$$h@!e about it too and I said I didn't want him suspended blah blah blah.  Why?  Because I'm used to people disagreeing with my beliefs on that subject and I don't take it personally.  I suggest trying it sometime.  You absolutely do take things personally, more so when people don't fall in line with your way of thinking.  You can sit here and pretend that's not what it's about all you want, but it is.  And it's pretty convenient you can't find it because I can't find it either and I have messages from when I first started here.  Yet it's disappeared into thin air but another PM thread between us still exists.  Weird!

And yeah, you changed.  You changed when you stopped being a mod because when you were a mod you had to hold back and be understanding of everyone and their way of thinking even when you didn't like it.  Now that the cord is cut, when people disagree and are equally as stubborn about it you start taking it personally.  Have I changed since I started posting here? You bet.  I stopped trying to fit in as much, stopped trying to agree with everything the majority says and stopped being message board honest and started being honest period.

Honestly, I think some people have legitimate transgender issues or at least a legit reason to label themselves that way.  The margin is probably small though.  People that simply dress up in the opposite sexes clothing and demand to be called a lady, that's different.  If they aren't harming me then by all means do what you want and what makes you happy.  But is that it?  Simple acknowledgement that they are the sex they wish to be?  No, because we have the whole bathroom disaster pandemic.  Next it will be wage gap nonsense, insurance rate differentials, gender equality for transgender people, discrimination lawsuits because 66 year old bald Chuck wants to work at Hooters but they wouldn't hire him, pervs in wings creeping in the ladies room winning million dollar lawsuits even though they were acting like sex offenders.

So, yeah.  That's my gripe with it.  You can mutilate your genitals if it makes you happy. Or you can wear panties if it makes you happy.  I don't care.  But we all know that's not the end of it.  My beef with MC was because SHE was a loose canon and was pretty much rude during simple discussions.  That's it.  I'll read the story yes and maybe I'll feel like a d!(k, so be it.  But nobody even knows if it's true or not, it could all be made up.  That's the beauty of a message board. We can be whoever we want online anonymously.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
knapplc said:
I've met polo. Polo and I shared a beer.  You, my friend, have no idea what polo was like.
Click to expand...


Nope, sure don't.  But I remember the reasoning you gave as to why he got banned.  And that reasoning is because his presence on the board became an ego problem.  You need to take a hard look in the mirror pal.  I know I'm a severely flawed individual, sometimes with a very narrow minded view of things.  I can admit that.  You on the other hand still have a devout Christian attitude towards others even though you've denounced christianity.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Redux said:
Nope, sure don't.  But I remember the reasoning you gave as to why he got banned.  And that reasoning is because his presence on the board became an ego problem.  You need to take a hard look in the mirror pal.  I know I'm a severely flawed individual, sometimes with a very narrow minded view of things.  I can admit that.  You on the other hand still have a devout Christian attitude towards others even though you've denounced christianity.
Click to expand...


WTF are you even talking about. I didn't ban polo or bean or any of that group. 

 
knapplc said:
WTF are you even talking about. I didn't ban polo or bean or any of that group. 
Click to expand...


Never said you did.

Edit.  I'm trying to find the post that gave the reasons for the ban purge but can't.  It was right around the time you quit being a mod, it was either you or zigs that gave the reason I think.  Either way, it was because Polo had become a distraction and the main focus of the board etc.  Well that and probably all the sock accounts used to give his buddies 30 some rep points per post.  But when he exited he had become pretty pompous, in a nutshell that's the comparisom

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Redux said:
Never said you did.

Edit.  I'm trying to find the post that gave the reasons for the ban purge but can't.  It was right around the time you quit being a mod, it was either you or zigs that gave the reason I think.  Either way, it was because Polo had become a distraction and the main focus of the board etc.  Well that and probably all the sock accounts used to give his buddies 30 some rep points per post.  But when he exited he had become pretty pompous, in a nutshell that's the comparisom
Click to expand...


I found where I explained what happened to polo, et al. 

knapplc said:
There was a disturbance. Many wept. The honorable took refuge in their strength while the weak cursed and gnashed their teeth.

From the ashes and charnel heaps a thing of hideous strength appeared. From this thing came a sound, at first that of a voice heard crying faintly in the wilderness, but soon it became a cacophony, as if we stood amidst a universe of noise and this was its chaotic center.

A light shone in the darkness. Many turned away - some out of fear, some because they were unable to hope. The light flamed like a thousand suns. Some were warmed by it. Some were burned.

There was confusion and much fear. Wild stories sprang forth of a man clothed in red whose eye could pierce all darkness, from whose mouth sprang doves and spears. The man provided refuge and dispossession in equal measure, doled out at the price of a question. The answer was known before the question was asked. There was a shield, 37 cubits in diameter, bossed with blazing bronze. Upon the shield were impaled both heroes and hard men.

At first many knew not that the shield was unclothed. Whereupon this became known, in secret alleys and byways, in copses and lairs, much discussion could be heard. There was a blaze of exultation and a river of lamentation, and the fire and water mingled and neither were quenched. A great reek arose, and amidst the fumes and foetors some danced and some despaired. A voice and a voice and a voice spoke, and though they whispered yet they shouted. And the shout was heard, and the great shield was employed once again, and yet more were impaled upon the shield, and the bronze ran with red, and yet shone ever brighter.

There came a yet greater time of consternation and the question was no longer asked, but wielded as a weapon. And though the shield was manifest, yet ever more was the question wielded.

From this time of consternation sprang forth again the man in red. At length he spake, and at length he explained. At once were his words mysterious yet always known, apocryphal yet attainable to all.

And while the question is yet asked, and while the shield yet shines in bronze and blood, the sun yet rises, and the snows fall and melt again, and lo! time marches ever on.
Click to expand...

 
Back
Top