tab-neb said:I just wish we could get inside Lauren's head. Did she call the police because she is a genuinely honest person or because her tire blew out?
So she isn't getting kicked off the team?
tab-neb said:I just wish we could get inside Lauren's head. Did she call the police because she is a genuinely honest person or because her tire blew out?
This is what the driver had said happened. I know it's not what it was, but I'm not going to get into details about it. I think there is a fine line when determining on who gets diversion and who doesn't. I would hate to be the one to make that decision, especially if there were other victims involved. I hope this will help her out and she will learn a valuable lesson from it, but it's just to bad that it took this to happen.First, I'm very sorry for what happened to your friend. It's a tragedy and nothing mitigates that.I'm sorry, but there should be no diversion for felony charges. I have a hard time agreeing with this scenerio. I am alittle bias because I had a friend get killed by a driver that hit him while he was walking on the side of the road. The driver was allowed to take diversion and was done with it. It is an injustice to the victims when something like this happens.
However, if you've ever changed the channel on your radio, if you've ever looked in the back seat, if you've ever dug in your glove box or if you've ever looked at a phone, map, friend in the passenger seat while driving, that's enough to kill someone. It can happen to anyone.
The ridiculous thing about driving is that it's the single most dangerous thing most people will do every day, and they never stop and think about how dangerous it really is. You are piloting, often without the requisite skill, a 1.5 ton missile at speeds in excess of 30 mph. The consequences of a moment's distraction are devastating, yet we're often looking at the trees, or a bird, or the girl in the next car, or the sunset, or whatever.
Somewhere between 6 and 10 minutes, yes. She called her mom first, and her mother calmed her down and got her to call 911. I can't claim to know Lauren well, but I would agree that injury hit-and-run is not indicative of her character, at least not as I know it.Did I read the article correctly, she did call 911, but it was like 10 minutes later? It was a lapse in judgement, if that was the case and not really indicitive of her character.
There was a decent interview in both the LJS and OWH articles about this where the officials basically said this wasn't unheard-of. Some felony murder suspects enter pretrial diversion, so if they're eligible, I would presume Lauren would be.How can Lauren be accepted into a pre trial diversion for a felony hit and run, all while driving on a suspended license?? How is this possible. I could understand IF her license wasnt suspended,but not so much since she was already in violation of the law by operating a motor vehicle.
Im not trying to bias, but I just dont get it.
Did she get her license reinstated right before the accident?Somewhere between 6 and 10 minutes, yes. She called her mom first, and her mother calmed her down and got her to call 911. I can't claim to know Lauren well, but I would agree that injury hit-and-run is not indicative of her character, at least not as I know it.Did I read the article correctly, she did call 911, but it was like 10 minutes later? It was a lapse in judgement, if that was the case and not really indicitive of her character.
There was a decent interview in both the LJS and OWH articles about this where the officials basically said this wasn't unheard-of. Some felony murder suspects enter pretrial diversion, so if they're eligible, I would presume Lauren would be.How can Lauren be accepted into a pre trial diversion for a felony hit and run, all while driving on a suspended license?? How is this possible. I could understand IF her license wasnt suspended,but not so much since she was already in violation of the law by operating a motor vehicle.
Im not trying to bias, but I just dont get it.
No, I believe it was last Tuesday. But everything she did was legal and available to the general public. She got no special favors.Did she get her license reinstated right before the accident?
Try telling that to all the people who think otherwise.No, I believe it was last Tuesday. But everything she did was legal and available to the general public. She got no special favors.Did she get her license reinstated right before the accident?
No thanks. I couldn't care less what they think. They are welcome to put themselves in that position and see what legal options they have. Some people won't believe until they're there themselves.Try telling that to all the people who think otherwise.No, I believe it was last Tuesday. But everything she did was legal and available to the general public. She got no special favors.Did she get her license reinstated right before the accident?
However, I will say the same thing I said about Lauren - I don't really think society needs to be protected from this 65-year-old woman by putting her through a felony trial.The [65-year-old] woman was not under the influence but didn't report herself because she was unaware that she had lightly struck another car while backing up in a parking lot,Reiman said.