GBRHouston
New member
I don't get the people who think Lee is 100%. Are the odds leaning in his favor? Yes. But it is way too early to name a starter, and nobody should assume one is going to start until MR names one.
CDog said: I wouldn't trust Sean Callahan to sell me a taco.
Husker in Kansas said: It'd be the best and worst taco you ever had
LOL...+1s...for all of you...LOLHammerhead said: Best going in, worst coming out?
He was good at Tulane, but not great. I think it is safe to assume that Riley will go with the guy who looks better in practice. He will not pick Lee solely because he has started a college game before and POB hasn't.It's safe to assume the guy with 2 years FCS starting experience has better odds of starting over the red shirt freshman who has never once even stepped on to the field. That said, I'm sure Riley will play whichever guy turns out to be the best.
As far as an early departure, consider POB has seen Fyfe have to step in for TA, even wonder if his red shirt was going to get burned at a moments notice. I suspect he'll be content in a back up role for a while, should it come to that.
Yeah, I'd say the guy made out ok. Yale undergrad and Harvard Law degree. Although, why the hell would he want to work at Credit Suisse?Witt might be the closest example to the POB situation since he was legitimately would have been the 2nd string QB and he didn't have a redshirt in his back pocket.Cody Green was the last second stringer to transfer. He started games for us in 2010, even if Rex Burkhead was the 'real' backup quarterbackI suppose Patrick Wit before him, then Harrison Beck. All guys that many of us thought, at one time, would become the next Nebraska great.![]()
However his transfer was probably as much academic as it was football related.
The best guy wins the job, simple as that.I think it is safe to assume that Riley will go with the guy who looks better in practice.That said, I'm sure Riley will play whichever guy turns out to be the best.
That's being extremely generous. Heh. 53%, 5.9 Y/A, nearly a 1:1 TD/INT ratio.He was good at Tulane . . .
I think it's incredibly difficult to accurately evaluate his early career considering he missed time due to a concussion and played with a broken thumb(?) most of his last season at Tulane.That's being extremely generous. Heh. 53%, 5.9 Y/A, nearly a 1:1 TD/INT ratio.He was good at Tulane . . .
And.....he was playing at Tulane being protected by a Tulane level offensive line.I think it's incredibly difficult to accurately evaluate his early career considering he missed time due to a concussion and played with a broken thumb(?) most of his last season at Tulane.That's being extremely generous. Heh. 53%, 5.9 Y/A, nearly a 1:1 TD/INT ratio.He was good at Tulane . . .
Against low level DLine, Backers, Secondary, it all evens outAnd.....he was playing at Tulane being protected by a Tulane level offensive line.I think it's incredibly difficult to accurately evaluate his early career considering he missed time due to a concussion and played with a broken thumb(?) most of his last season at Tulane.That's being extremely generous. Heh. 53%, 5.9 Y/A, nearly a 1:1 TD/INT ratio.He was good at Tulane . . .
Playing against comparable talent.And.....he was playing at Tulane being protected by a Tulane level offensive line.I think it's incredibly difficult to accurately evaluate his early career considering he missed time due to a concussion and played with a broken thumb(?) most of his last season at Tulane.That's being extremely generous. Heh. 53%, 5.9 Y/A, nearly a 1:1 TD/INT ratio.He was good at Tulane . . .