Let's speculate a future with 4 super conferences

OK, I'll play, but in my version, 80 teams make the cut for 16 pods of 5 teams each. Still gives you your nice 16 team playoff, and no existing BCS school is left out. I had trouble coming up with the last few to fill out the 80 and did them as much for regional convenience as anything. Not all rivalries are preserved but you will definitely go out of your pod for games, and even your region if needed. It's not perfect by any means.

ATLANTIC

North Carolina

North Carolina St

Duke

Wake Forest

ECU

---

Pitt

Syracuse

Rutgers

Uconn

Boston College

---

Maryland

Virginia

Virginia Tech

WV

Marshall

---

Florida

Florida St

Miami

South Florida

Central Florida

==========================

SOUTHEAST

South Carolina

Clemson

Georgia

Ga Tech

UAB

---

Tennessee

Vandy

Louisville

Kentucky

Memphis

---

Alabama

Auburn

Mississippi

Mississippi St

Southern Miss

---

Louisiana Tech

LSU

Houston

Ark

Baylor

===================

MIDWEST

Indiana

Purdue

Notre Dame

Ohio State

Cincinnati

----

Illinois

Northwestern

Iowa

Iowa St

Missouri

---

Michigan

Michigan St

Wisconsin

Minnesota

Penn St

----

Oklahoma

Oklahoma St

Kansas

Kansas St

Nebraska

============

WEST

Texas

Texas A&M

Texas Tech

TCU

UTEP

---

Colorado

Arizona

Arizona St

BYU

Utah

----

USC

UCLA

Stanford

Cal

Fresno St

----

Oregon

Oregon St

Washington

Washington St

Boise St
That'd be ideal too. Nice work.

 
I will give it a shot:

Division 2

Oregon, Oregon st. Washington, Washington St.

That was a lot harder than I thought, I know that teams like uconn, and other great basketball schools will not be left out, based this mainly on football untill I got to the Pac 10 (conference 4) and I got stumpped.

So there it is a chance to make fun of kansas husker's spelling, grammer, and geogrophy all in one post.
Thanks for keeping my team's geographical rivals together. That said, would you organize the conferences to honor traditional rivalries or let the individual schools sort it out?

I would let the schools sort it out. For the most part you can keep the rivals together just based on geogrophy.

 
nexus, don't you think that texas and oklahoma would more likely go the sec route, rather than the pac 10 route?
In reality, I haven't a clue. :LOLtartar

But my best guess would be UT and A&M would go to the Pac-10 because they're similar academically speaking and also because UT and A&M are a package deal.

Oklahoma and Oklahoma St. are also a package deal from what I've heard and they'd fit in the SEC better since they're similar with those institutions academically.
no one has a clue. i just figure that UT would want to keep with the big boys, they are close to the sec, and pac 10 football is soft.
All the more reason why they'd pick the Pac-10 over the SEC. They'd have an easier route to the BCS in the Pac-10 than in the SEC. That's just my opinion.
i think it can work both ways. i can also see them wanting to be part of something more respectable, the top conference. but they would dominate in the pac 10, i don't know why, i just don't see them as a pac 10 team.
In my opinion the SEC would view Texas as the 3rd powerhouse team behind Florida and Alabama. Sorta like how Nebraska is viewed as the 3rd powerhouse team behind OU and UT.

Also if it really came right down to it and UT and A&M were forced to choose between the SEC or Pac-10, I think the administrators would choose Pac-10 for the academics.

 
OK, I'll play, but in my version, 80 teams make the cut for 16 pods of 5 teams each. Still gives you your nice 16 team playoff, and no existing BCS school is left out. I had trouble coming up with the last few to fill out the 80 and did them as much for regional convenience as anything. Not all rivalries are preserved but you will definitely go out of your pod for games, and even your region if needed. It's not perfect by any means.

ATLANTIC

North Carolina

North Carolina St

Duke

Wake Forest

ECU

---

Pitt

Syracuse

Rutgers

Uconn

Boston College

---

Maryland

Virginia

Virginia Tech

WV

Marshall

---

Florida

Florida St

Miami

South Florida

Central Florida

==========================

SOUTHEAST

South Carolina

Clemson

Georgia

Ga Tech

UAB

---

Tennessee

Vandy

Louisville

Kentucky

Memphis

---

Alabama

Auburn

Mississippi

Mississippi St

Southern Miss

---

Louisiana Tech

LSU

Houston

Ark

Baylor

===================

MIDWEST

Indiana

Purdue

Notre Dame

Ohio State

Cincinnati

----

Illinois

Northwestern

Iowa

Iowa St

Missouri

---

Michigan

Michigan St

Wisconsin

Minnesota

Penn St

----

Oklahoma

Oklahoma St

Kansas

Kansas St

Nebraska

============

WEST

Texas

Texas A&M

Texas Tech

TCU

UTEP

---

Colorado

Arizona

Arizona St

BYU

Utah

----

USC

UCLA

Stanford

Cal

Fresno St

----

Oregon

Oregon St

Washington

Washington St

Boise St

Simply amazing, the only change I would make is to replace Utep with Houston. This is dar and away the best realignment I've seen. The best part is we get our yearly oklahoma game back.

 
OK, I'll play, but in my version, 80 teams make the cut for 16 pods of 5 teams each. Still gives you your nice 16 team playoff, and no existing BCS school is left out. I had trouble coming up with the last few to fill out the 80 and did them as much for regional convenience as anything. Not all rivalries are preserved but you will definitely go out of your pod for games, and even your region if needed. It's not perfect by any means.

ATLANTIC

North Carolina

North Carolina St

Duke

Wake Forest

ECU

---

Pitt

Syracuse

Rutgers

Uconn

Boston College

---

Maryland

Virginia

Virginia Tech

WV

Marshall

---

Florida

Florida St

Miami

South Florida

Central Florida

==========================

SOUTHEAST

South Carolina

Clemson

Georgia

Ga Tech

UAB

---

Tennessee

Vandy

Louisville

Kentucky

Memphis

---

Alabama

Auburn

Mississippi

Mississippi St

Southern Miss

---

Louisiana Tech

LSU

Houston

Ark

Baylor

===================

MIDWEST

Indiana

Purdue

Notre Dame

Ohio State

Cincinnati

----

Illinois

Northwestern

Iowa

Iowa St

Missouri

---

Michigan

Michigan St

Wisconsin

Minnesota

Penn St

----

Oklahoma

Oklahoma St

Kansas

Kansas St

Nebraska

============

WEST

Texas

Texas A&M

Texas Tech

TCU

UTEP

---

Colorado

Arizona

Arizona St

BYU

Utah

----

USC

UCLA

Stanford

Cal

Fresno St

----

Oregon

Oregon St

Washington

Washington St

Boise St

Simply amazing, the only change I would make is to replace Utep with Houston. This is dar and away the best realignment I've seen. The best part is we get our yearly oklahoma game back.
isn't it funny, how this would never work because it is too good to be true.

 
---

Louisiana Tech

LSU

Houston

Ark

Baylor

===================

Texas

Texas A&M

Texas Tech

TCU

UTEP

---

Simply amazing, the only change I would make is to replace Utep with Houston. This is dar and away the best realignment I've seen. The best part is we get our yearly oklahoma game back.
Thanks. I have Houston in with Baylor, Arkansas, and the Louisiana schools, and kept UTEP with Texas Tech and the other 3 Texas schools. Not a perfect east/west split but close enough.

 
My only issue is that while I think so of the proposals are nice, the top prgrams are just going to dilute their TV revenue... Adding teasm that dont add a lot of eyes and get even a 75% of a share nets out less money for the big boys, and let's rememebr who is calling the shots.... If you don't bring money to the talks, you gots to go...

 
nexus, don't you think that texas and oklahoma would more likely go the sec route, rather than the pac 10 route?
Not to be a hater, but UT is a much better University academically than OU. Pac 10 had 70% AAU members, SEC has 16%. UT and OU may not seperate, but Texas is a better Pac 10 fit due to adcademics and the lack of many teams to threaten them. OU is a lot like an SEC school in a lot of ways, including sports revenue, they would be 6th amongst the other existing 12.... I would think UT will pull OU away frm the SEC, but OU on their own would gravitate there...

 
nexus, don't you think that texas and oklahoma would more likely go the sec route, rather than the pac 10 route?
Not to be a hater, but UT is a much better University academically than OU. Pac 10 had 70% AAU members, SEC has 16%. UT and OU may not seperate, but Texas is a better Pac 10 fit due to adcademics and the lack of many teams to threaten them. OU is a lot like an SEC school in a lot of ways, including sports revenue, they would be 6th amongst the other existing 12.... I would think UT will pull OU away frm the SEC, but OU on their own would gravitate there...
i guess where they go will be telling about their overall priorities. they go pac-10, they do respect academics; they go SEC, it is only about sports.

 
If Texas wants to stay where the money is in college sports, the SEC is the way to go. It's worked for a quality school like Florida, and it can work for Texas.

 
If Texas wants to stay where the money is in college sports, the SEC is the way to go. It's worked for a quality school like Florida, and it can work for Texas.
Florida is the only Public AAU school in the Conference though, and they were in long before they decided to make themselves into a great school, whcih I agree they have achieved... Texas really has a choice though, and dominating a Pac-10 East may be more attrative than adding LSU and Bama. That said, if the big 2 of Texas and Oklahoma all go SEC, I guess they likely only gain LSU who is a real threat, Ole Miss, Miss State and Arkansas are not (when compared to Texas)... The SEC East would then be INSANE (Florida, Georgia, Bama, Auburn AND Tennessee... ugh)

 
Maybe this betrays my ignorance about Texas' academics, but I've never gotten the impression they were all that balled up about being an academic superstar. I think academically they're "better" than Nebraska, but we're still half an agricultural school at heart. I would imagine they'd go where the money is, and that's the SEC. Culturally they're far more similar to the Southeast than the Southwest, and that's not even close.

 
There's a lot of Texas money that's gone to academics as well as athletics. They get ranked up there or just below the best public schools like Michigan, Cal, Virginia, and North Carolina. Argue the rankings if you like, but it is considered by many, especially themselves, to be a very good school.

If you want to view it with one way at looking at the quality of the undergrads, if you are in the top 10% of your high school class you are guaranteed admission to the Texas public university of your choice, including UT, A&M, Texas Tech, Houston, Texas State, and various other UT campuses. UT nearly fills it's freshman class with those top 10%ers who choose it, to the point where there has been talk of removing the guarantee so they can more diversity, like students who excel in one area but whose overall GPA isn't quite up there.

 
Maybe this betrays my ignorance about Texas' academics, but I've never gotten the impression they were all that balled up about being an academic superstar. I think academically they're "better" than Nebraska, but we're still half an agricultural school at heart. I would imagine they'd go where the money is, and that's the SEC. Culturally they're far more similar to the Southeast than the Southwest, and that's not even close.
The state of Texas is a Hybrid between the Southeast and the Southwest, but UT is more like the West. They are a lot like California in Austin. Hippie and superficial at the same time :) , Big IT and tech presence, big cafe scene, big live music scene, lots of cultures are represented from all over the world, lots of expensive foreign cars... definitely not A&M by any means

Texas is a really good school, though. US News rated them 47th overall amongst all schools, tied with Florida (best Public School in SEC) compare to KU at 96, NU tied with KU, Mizzou at 102 and K-State is Tier 3....

 
Maybe this betrays my ignorance about Texas' academics, but I've never gotten the impression they were all that balled up about being an academic superstar. I think academically they're "better" than Nebraska, but we're still half an agricultural school at heart. I would imagine they'd go where the money is, and that's the SEC. Culturally they're far more similar to the Southeast than the Southwest, and that's not even close.
If you follow what the Texas people have been saying on other boards, the academic reputation is VERY important to them. That is one big reason why when the Big 12 was formed they pushed for an overhaul in the recruiting. The Big 12 was also their third choice. They first approached the Pac 10 and Big 10 but when both conferences turned them down for various reasons they ended up settling on destroying the Big 8 - er forming the Big 12.

 
Back
Top