husker_fan_from_sweden
New member
This thread could use a little comedic relief. None other than from Dave Chappelle "how old is 15 really?"
*Warning does contain some offensive language
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread must hold the record for most eye rolls
You’re a better eye roll farmer than me.
This isn’t a rape/assault case though. One thing that seems certain is Mo sent the video.I find it hard to believe that this young lady was forced to give a bj
i find it hard to believe 2 boys would forcibly assault her , film it, then distribute it if it truely was an assault
Meanwhile the girl doesn’t say anything to anyone and seemingly is living a productive life
a more likely scenario
she did this deed
the video gets around school
she makes up a story to save her reputation -or first reaction and now buried in the lie
in any event mo shouldn’t have sent her the video
16 year old kids who’s girlfriends give bjs to fellow classmates would probably make more than a few Kids do something like this driven by jealous embarrassment
not cool
but it’s not child porn the way most think of it and he only sent it to her
he deserves punishment but not the death penalty
but in today’s ultra hyper me too political environment evidence and facts and due process matter little
this isn’t the first time this has been done by a white girl to an African American young man
Like the sacred heart case
2 young men accused of rape in bathroom
gal lies about it because she wanted to stay on good side of prospective boyfriend
She accused the other 2 Boys of assault
It looks like the police have chosen to not go after them
which most likely means she’s lying
Or, now hear me out, it means the police don’t have enough evidence 2-3 years later to file formal chargesShe accused the other 2 Boys of assault
It looks like the police have chosen to not go after them
which most likely means she’s lying
Im disturbed in many ways. Both in your thesis "she's lying!", shows a gross misunderstanding of what constitutes sexual assault, which I don't want to derail the thread by going into. Other posters have done a good job explaining it already.She accused the other 2 Boys of assault
It looks like the police have chosen to not go after them
which most likely means she’s lying
And many teens in that position probably would lie
especially with mom and the whole school in on it
so mo sends her and only her a copy
the jealous immature boyfriend who’s gal gives bjs to classmates on camera in a car
and is humiliated by said video being passed around school
he made a mistake I’m guessing more than a handful of kids that age would do
he sent the video to her and only her
punishment yes
probation yes
penance yes
death penalty
No one can say what happened before or after that 10 second clip. All we have for for facts is the video. It doesn’t sound like there is anything in the video that shows assault. Hence why the police did nothing about an assault charge on the boys.The 6th person who thinks rape is only rape if there is obvious physical force involved. Getting really sick of the ignorance on this.
She didn’t say it was assault until 2 years later, and waiting to report it doesn’t mean it wasn’t assault anymore than the lack of physical force.
You later give reasons to doubt her, which I agree with. But I want people to stop being ignorant about what is required for sexual assault to be sexual assault. It can be rape even if it doesn’t look that way to anyone watching the video. It’s legally considered rape if you use coercion/threats/blackmail which would not have occured on camera. Not saying any of that happened, I just want people to realize rape doesn’t necessarily look a certain way.
The lack of physical force isn’t a reason to doubt her (there are other reasons for that). It just means the video is not very good evidence of her claim, which is likely why she’s not taking legal action.
No one can say what happened before or after that 10 second clip. All we have for for facts is the video. It doesn’t sound like there is anything in the video that shows assault. Hence why the police did nothing about an assault charge on the boys.
So a think it is pointless to debate that fact anymore.
I'm not debating whether it was assault or not. I'm debating whether it CAN be assault if there is no physical force, and it can.
I get it. But it’s nearly impossible to prove a verbal coercion if not recorded because there would be no signs of physical force. I’m not saying your not right- I’m just saying it’s nearly impossible to prove a conversation took placeI'm not debating whether it was assault or not. I'm debating whether it CAN be assault if there is no physical force, and it can.