knapplc
International Man of Mystery
I'm very interested in hearing why he A. possessed a video that was directed to be deleted 3 years prior and B. Why he sent it to the girl with the phrase "remember this hoe"
And why he didn't use a comma, too!
I'm very interested in hearing why he A. possessed a video that was directed to be deleted 3 years prior and B. Why he sent it to the girl with the phrase "remember this hoe"
Kids today aren't taught grammar like the good ol daysAnd why he didn't use a comma, too!
Apparently it’s a real case cracker.I'm very interested in hearing why he A. possessed a video that was directed to be deleted 3 years prior and B. Why he sent it to the girl with the phrase "remember this hoe"
Agreed, especially considering the CA prosecutors literally have 2 non-CA attorneys on record admitting that Mo possessed the video. I don't think hearing "Mo's side" is going help or justify that
His own lawyers have said he sent/possessed the video. That would be why I think there’s not much left.Imagine saying that in the Quintez Cephus case.
Your blind and unending drive to say that case is basically closed before it has even started is pretty bizarre.
I feel like I die a little inside every time I read these posts. 30-50 Feral Hogs, regarding this statement, "[SIZE=10.5pt]I'm very interested in hearing why he A. possessed a video that was directed to be deleted 3 years prior and B. Why he sent it to the girl with the phrase "remember this hoe".[/SIZE] I am going to take the swing at why.![]()
[SIZE=10.5pt]A. possessed a video that was directed to be deleted 3 years prior and B[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]-Someone sent him the video of his ex-girl friend giving two guys oral sex. 90% of the guys on this board, at 18 years old, would have saved this. Wrong, sure, but tell me who [/SIZE]wouldn't[SIZE=10.5pt] have?[/SIZE]
B. [SIZE=10.5pt]Why he sent it to the girl with the phrase "remember this hoe"[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]-because he was pissed that she wasn't interested in sex with him, and this was his response[/SIZE]
Hypothetically, lets say these are the answers to your questions. W[SIZE=10.5pt]hat do you want to happen if this is the case?[/SIZE] [SIZE=10.5pt]Kicked off the team, suspension and/or jail?[/SIZE] [SIZE=10.5pt]I am struggling understating the agenda of the individuals who want him out without knowing the truth about the case.[/SIZE] [SIZE=10.5pt]Don’t give me the bulls#!t optics of the University.[/SIZE] [SIZE=10.5pt]This is a University that has issues and imperfection’s just like all others. [/SIZE] [SIZE=10.5pt]Additionally, this one issue doesn’t change the opinion of jacka$$ Colorado fan or meathead internet media writer guy about UNL. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]This is my humble opinion of what should happened, exactly what is happening![/SIZE] [SIZE=10.5pt]He didn’t make the video nor was he in the video.[/SIZE] [SIZE=10.5pt]Should he have done what he did?[/SIZE] [SIZE=10.5pt]No. Could he pay [/SIZE]severely[SIZE=10.5pt] because of the child porn law? Yes[/SIZE]
I don't really care what happens to him. If he stays on the team, fine. If Frost boots him, fine. My opinion of his character today isn't going to change. He still has an opportunity to change his life and do better. Based on getting caught with weed, regardless of the charges being dropped, shows me he's not yet ready to make good choices.
Adults make just as many dumb choices as teensIt's almost as if he's a teenager. Weird.
As it turns out, Maurice Washington is an adult, so this theory checks out.Adults make just as many dumb choices as teens
Why don't you just say you have no problem with Washington did? It seems you want to.It's almost as if he's a teenager. Weird.
Why don't you just say you have no problem with Washington did? It seems you want to.