\\ Michigan Game Discussion Thread //

zoogies said:
I like this move to bring Kellogg in. Tommy needs to be protected and is limited in what we'll ask him to do. Ron is our guy to send in on a 2-minute drill anyway and if we have to do that, don't do it cold. We also attack the Michigan defense in a couple of different ways with Kellogg. Keeps changing things up.
Click to expand...
plus it gives us that "WTH are they crazy" vibe that might really intimidate Michicken

 
Spielman gets it.

Last week, TA played like stank. We kept him in. This week - he gets points on 2 out of 3 drives, and we pull him.

If something is working, there is no need to change it. Whether it is Tommy or RK3, just stick with what is working.

 
Now we know why TA starts good and then falls apart ... Beck talks to him while RK is playing
default_smile.png


 
zoogies said:
I like this move to bring Kellogg in. Tommy needs to be protected and is limited in what we'll ask him to do. Ron is our guy to send in on a 2-minute drill anyway and if we have to do that, don't do it cold. We also attack the Michigan defense in a couple of different ways with Kellogg. Keeps changing things up.
Click to expand...
I agree in some aspects, but the one thing we have been doing with success is zone read or option.... We don't have that threat with Kellogg

 
zoogies said:
I like this move to bring Kellogg in. Tommy needs to be protected and is limited in what we'll ask him to do. Ron is our guy to send in on a 2-minute drill anyway and if we have to do that, don't do it cold. We also attack the Michigan defense in a couple of different ways with Kellogg. Keeps changing things up.
Click to expand...
I'd agree if TA wasn't getting it done. But I'd rather ride a hot TA offense to TDs while it's clicking.

Rather have TDs now over possible TDs in crunch, I guess?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top