where?He still posts... :blink:
i will take your wager. but will you be man enouge to pay up when you lose?where?He still posts... :blink:
Not in this thread.
I suspect he will continue to hide until after kickoff.
big talker until a realistic wager is made. :lol:
but you have to respond before kickoffi will take your wager. but will you be man enouge to pay up when you lose?where?He still posts... :blink:
Not in this thread.
I suspect he will continue to hide until after kickoff.
big talker until a realistic wager is made. :lol:
What part of the word "piecemeal" do you not understand. It means cutting and pasting from an entry to create something completely out-of-context - which is what you did.Peicemeal? I didnt make you sound like anything.I quoted two specific points you outlined:
1. Minn and Wisc. have 'decent' running attacks.
2. Neb needs to establish the run.
and then provided instances of how that is optimistic.
1. Minn and Wisc. have better than 'decent' running attacks. Minn is second in the country.
2. Neb. run games is close to last in the country.
I then wished you luck.
Ill wish you luck again.
careful Roy, dont trip backpedaling that fast.The real point of the wager question has now been answered. I have no interest in an agreed upon money wager over the internet. That is illegal. What I did find out was that any UM fan interested in taking that bet in their heart means very simply that they have no confidence in UM covering the point spread.
I guess we now know!!!