Mo Washington Spill-Over Thread

Moiraine said:
There were theories/rumors with the thing at Armstrong/Westerkamp’s party that the girl agreed to a threesome and then was embarrassed about it later. 

In this case the girl in question is probably still living with her parents which gives her more reasons to say she wasn’t willing. 
Click to expand...


All I know is if I’m a teenage girl who does willingly (not saying it was) agree to a threesome and then sometime later a video of it gets out and my parents see it, I’m more than likely changing my story to it being assault and not consensual. And if that was the situation, it doesn’t seem a stretch that just possibly that girl could’ve been a little bit loose with all the boys when she was dating a former boyfriend and possibly that is why they broke up and why that former boyfriend may have been angry enough to throw that video back in her face 2 or 3 years later.

Now for my disclaimers. I have no idea if it happened like that. At. All. It’s just what it “feels” like may have happened based on how the story has broken out and the odd timelines, late filing of charges, etc. I also think it’s possible that the former boyfriend may have not been aware that the actions in the video had gone on to be claimed as sexual assault. Maybe it was as simple as the boyfriend having some prior evidence she was a hoe and to him the video was just more of her being her. But like I said, that’s just my imagination running away with me. However if that was the situation, it severely curtails the evilness and questionable morals of his sending her that video IMO.

Now on the other side, if he had any idea that video may have been a situation of assault then he’s a scumbag and more than deserving of any charges or consequences that come his way. Sure “legally” there may still be revenge porn and/or child porn charges involved but, in this case, I’m more concerned with what he knew and his motives and the real story of her assault and character than with the pure legality of it. And yes I feel a bit dirty doubting her character given what she may have been subjected to.  Likely we’ll never know any of those details other than the result of the legal charges against MW.  I believe the sexual assault case has been sealed due to those involved being minors. I understand why that is but that may actually harm the former boyfriends ability to make his case, or at least hamper his ability to mitigate the supposed evilness of his actions. So the whole deal is pretty much a mess. Good lesson for teens to not  have or send videos or pics like that for any reason.

 
JJ Husker said:
All I know is if I’m a teenage girl who does willingly (not saying it was) agree to a threesome and then sometime later a video of it gets out and my parents see it, I’m more than likely changing my story to it being assault and not consensual. And if that was the situation, it doesn’t seem a stretch that just possibly that girl could’ve been a little bit loose with all the boys when she was dating a former boyfriend and possibly that is why they broke up and why that former boyfriend may have been angry enough to throw that video back in her face 2 or 3 years later.

Now for my disclaimers. I have no idea if it happened like that. At. All. It’s just what it “feels” like may have happened based on how the story has broken out and the odd timelines, late filing of charges, etc. I also think it’s possible that the former boyfriend may have not been aware that the actions in the video had gone on to be claimed as sexual assault. Maybe it was as simple as the boyfriend having some prior evidence she was a hoe and to him the video was just more of her being her. But like I said, that’s just my imagination running away with me. However if that was the situation, it severely curtails the evilness and questionable morals of his sending her that video IMO.

Now on the other side, if he had any idea that video may have been a situation of assault then he’s a scumbag and more than deserving of any charges or consequences that come his way. Sure “legally” there may still be revenge porn and/or child porn charges involved but, in this case, I’m more concerned with what he knew and his motives and the real story of her assault and character than with the pure legality of it. And yes I feel a bit dirty doubting her character given what she may have been subjected to.  Likely we’ll never know any of those details other than the result of the legal charges against MW.  I believe the sexual assault case has been sealed due to those involved being minors. I understand why that is but that may actually harm the former boyfriends ability to make his case, or at least hamper his ability to mitigate the supposed evilness of his actions. So the whole deal is pretty much a mess. Good lesson for teens to not  have or send videos or pics like that for any reason.
Click to expand...




This is pretty much how I feel. I don't think Washington knew about the sexual assault claim, and it's one of the more important details. If he didn't, it's an angry/immature/stupid retort by someone who's been spurned. Spurned by someone who's willing to have a threesome with 2 different guys who aren't him. Or that's how he would see it.

If he did know about the claim and hoped to hurt her because of it, then I don't want him on the team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moiraine said:
This is pretty much how I feel. I don't think Washington knew about the sexual assault claim, and it's one of the more important details. If he didn't, it's an angry/immature/stupid retort by someone who's been spurned. Spurned by someone who's willing to have a threesome with 2 different guys who aren't him. Or that's how he would see it.

If he did know about the claim and hoped to hurt her because of it, then I don't want him on the team.
Click to expand...


Yep, exactly.

 
StPaulHusker said:
“Hey guys, I’ve had a questionable sexual  encounter so clearly Maurice Washington is innocent.”—Redux several times in the past few days
Click to expand...
C'mon, you know that isn't what he's saying. He's just saying we don't have all the facts so maybe we should refrain from being judge, jury and executioner at this point because it could be something less than some are making it out to be. There will still be plenty of opportunity to question his morals and guilt if and when more information warrants it.

What if it was this; "Hey guys, MW has been accused so obviously he's a POS, is guilty and obviously Frost knew he was a POS when he recruited him"--StPaulHusker several times in the past few days.

Pretty much the same thing except I think this version more accurately represents what has actually transpired.

 
JJ Husker said:
C'mon, you know that isn't what he's saying. He's just saying we don't have all the facts so maybe we should refrain from being judge, jury and executioner at this point because it could be something less than some are making it out to be. There will still be plenty of opportunity to question his morals and guilt if and when more information warrants it.

What if it was this; "Hey guys, MW has been accused so obviously he's a POS, is guilty and obviously Frost knew he was a POS when he recruited him"--StPaulHusker several times in the past few days.

Pretty much the same thing except I think this version more accurately represents what has actually transpired.
Click to expand...
He’s being a dips#!t thinking people care about his backwoods f#&%ing.  It’s stupid 

 
ZRod said:
It's distribution of child porn regardless if the act was consensual or not (and Mo wasn't even a part of the act). If he sent the text he's in deep s#!t.
Click to expand...




Legally I think you're correct. But that's not the only thing that matters here. Not sure on the deep s#!t part though. See knapp's post.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
StPaulHusker said:
Perhaps the difference would be that the kid that got probation because he was under the age of 18 at the time he shared the video and Washington wasn't?  
Click to expand...


That's a possibility, and likely to be part of the prosecutor's approach. But I have a hard time thinking they're going to waste too much time & effort over a kid having a moment of stupidity.

 
Back
Top