Chaddyboxer
Banned
That is hilarious!My friend (player) told me last week Tim Beck walked into a player meeting with a handful of rocks and told taylor "these are your new footballs" and everyone started laughing, i think that is hilarious!
That is hilarious!My friend (player) told me last week Tim Beck walked into a player meeting with a handful of rocks and told taylor "these are your new footballs" and everyone started laughing, i think that is hilarious!
Pretty much on the money...I still give OSU the edge at night in the shoe but the MSU game hardly proves they can stop our run game. MSU certainly has a solid run-game, but nothing special. Yes Bell put-up some gawdy numbers but said numbers required a crap-ton of carries. We run considerably more effectively than MSU and we actually have a credible passing attack. Now if we just had MSU's defense.
Exactly. Before the game:southernoregonhusker said:Statistically, Wisconsin had a very good run defense too.
Good stuff and good points.Exactly. Before the game:southernoregonhusker said:Statistically, Wisconsin had a very good run defense too.
Wisconsin Defensive Ranks 9/1/12 - 9/29/12
Statistic - National Rank (yards/points per game)
Rushing Defense - 13th (81)
Pass Efficiency Defense - 63rd (132)
Total Defense - 31st (326)
Scoring Defense - 33rd (18)
After the game:
Wisconsin Defensive Ranks as of 9/30/12
Statistic - National Rank (yards/points per game)
Rushing Defense - 31st (116)
Pass Efficiency Defense - 59th (127)
Total Defense - 39th (349)
Scoring Defense - 34th (20)
So, we raised their numbers thusly:
Rushing Defense: -18 spots nationally (+35yards per game)
Pass Efficiency Defense: +2 spots nationally (-5 yards per game)
Total Defense: -8 spots nationally (+23 yards per game)
Scoring defense: -1 spot nationally (+2 points per game)
That's taking it on the chin a little bit. There was some boasting prior to this game that Nebraska had decent stats so far this year, but we hadn't seen a Big Ten defense yet. But we have - we saw them all a year ago. And we figured a couple of things out, apparently.
It wasn't Nebraska's defense sucking wind at the end of that game. It wasn't Nebraska's defense getting gashed for five yards per carry at the end of that game.
Pretty much on the money...I still give OSU the edge at night in the shoe but the MSU game hardly proves they can stop our run game. MSU certainly has a solid run-game, but nothing special. Yes Bell put-up some gawdy numbers but said numbers required a crap-ton of carries. We run considerably more effectively than MSU and we actually have a credible passing attack. Now if we just had MSU's defense.
In the beginning, the shoe will be rocking, they'll stuff a couple runs, and that will get everone pumped up. But the fact we've got 3 kids we can give the ball to, and that they're just going to keep on coming. They'd better be really deep in the front 7, because I think if we keep hitting them in the mouth, they'll buckle...
As long as Beck's brain doesn't fall out of his a$$, and keeps running the ball.
Nor was it Nebraska's offensive line sucking wind. That was great.southernoregonhusker said:Statistically, Wisconsin had a very good run defense too.
It wasn't Nebraska's defense sucking wind at the end of that game. It wasn't Nebraska's defense getting gashed for five yards per carry at the end of that game.