We're recruiting at a top-20/top-30 level. We're getting top-50 results. That's a huge problem.
We have a mental check-out game every season, and in bad seasons two or three. That's been going on for 20 years through five different regimes.
I do agree that Nebraska has underperformed based on recruiting, but I do want to make one thing clear about recruiting rankings, it's not simple to compare rankings of class and assume talent.
For example, for 2021 Nebraska had the #20 class in the country, with four players rated 4*s. The difference between Nebraska's #20 class and the #15 class is huge, Texas finished with one 5* and ten 4* players. More than double the blue chip talent.
Meanwhile, the difference between our class at #20 and Minnesota at #38 isn't that much, they recruited four 4* (just like us) players and have a similar average player rating. Even comparing our class at #20 to Northwestern's class ranked #50, they recruited three 4* players (one fewer than Nebraska) and have an average player rating slightly lower.
In sum, when comparing classes, don't compare class rankings because it's deceptive. As Nebraska's #20 ranked recruiting class is closer in talent to Northwestern at #50 (30 spots below) than it is to Texas at #15.
To determine if a class is successful, add up the number of 4* and 5* players. To compete, half your class needs to be in this category. Nebraska realistically can't do that, but they can shoot for 8 of them a season, which is closer to 40% of their class. If Nebraska recruits that many, the class is good. If they recruit less, the class is bad. It's that simple.