runningblind
All-American
If by baseball school, you mean volleyball school then I agree.Nebraska is a baseball school now. Might as well play in the best conference in the land.
If by baseball school, you mean volleyball school then I agree.Nebraska is a baseball school now. Might as well play in the best conference in the land.
I thought we were supposed to get a 30 for 30 for the 90s Huskers and then ESPN canceled it. ESPN is a gluten for giving NU the psych!This is a 30 for 30. In 15 years people will look back at this with a lot of different reactions. I think it is a great idea.
I also think everyone that posts here would watch it.
Good lord, they cancelled basketball tournaments at halftime!
Don't let your stupid politics get in the way of a story that is still being told.
Very fair point!If by baseball school, you mean volleyball school then I agree.
If by baseball school, you mean volleyball school then I agree.
I'd actually prefer staying in the Big Ten for volleyball, as iron sharpens iron. But we'd run a train through the SEC.
Of course ESPN is looking to make money.. from advertising and creating strong content to get more viewers.I mean I get what you are saying but do you think ESPN, the product of one of the most money hungry entities on the planet, is doing 30 for 30s just cause they want to get the truth out there? Can documentaries only be made by people who refuse to make any money from it?
Um, @Stumpy1, stop calling the kettle black. Ha ha.Dan Lust sounds like a porn name.
This is a 30 for 30. In 15 years people will look back at this with a lot of different reactions. I think it is a great idea.
I also think everyone that posts here would watch it.
Good lord, they cancelled basketball tournaments at halftime!
Don't let your stupid politics get in the way of a story that is still being told.
ESPN doesnt care whether the content is strong or not. They will air anything that makes money. If they cared about content they wouldn't employ a bunch of hot take generators like Stephen A Smith.Of course ESPN is looking to make money.. from advertising and creating strong content to get more viewers.
This guy is basically pandering to an audience to get a quick buck when I dont think he really has much to offer true insight.
I am well aware that everything(mostly) is driven by money.
ESPN doesnt care whether the content is strong or not. They will air anything that makes money. If they cared about content they wouldn't employ a bunch of hot take generators like Stephen A Smith.
I disagree when it comes to the 30/30 or E60 series and that is what I was talking about. They want to make money, but I also think they spend a lot of money to make sure the content/story is told correctly. The series is tremendously well done and they have also chosen some unpopular or unknown sports to highlight.PasstheDamnBallGuy said:ESPN doesnt care whether the content is strong or not. They will air anything that makes money. If they cared about content they wouldn't employ a bunch of hot take generators like Stephen A Smith.
That's a good point those do seem to be well done. Doubt we will see one on the Miss St Ole Miss recruiting scandal but we can't expect that much. I just think overall if those didn't make money ESPN would not hesitate to cut them whether they are well done or not.I disagree when it comes to the 30/30 or E60 series and that is what I was talking about. They want to make money, but I also think they spend a lot of money to make sure the content/story is told correctly. The series is tremendously well done and they have also chosen some unpopular or unknown sports to highlight.