Nebraska-Missouri by the numbers

huskerscott

huskerscott

Starter
Comparing Stats.......

Offense

Rushing

#5 Nebraska--290 yards

#79 Missouri--138 yards

Passing

#16 Missouri--286 yards

#100 Nebraska--169 yards

Total Offense

#17 Nebraska-- 459 yards

#32 Missouri-- 424 yards

Scoring

#10 Nebraska-- 38.86 points

#24 Missouri-- 34.71 points

3rd Down Conversions

#38 Nebraska-- 37-87 42.53%

#96 Missouri-- 36-96 37.50%

Defense

Rush

#24 Missouri--114.57 yards

#79 Nebraska--165.14 yards

Pass

#3 Nebraska--140.71 yards

#76 Missouri--224.57 yards

Scoring

#5 Missouri-- 13.14 yards

#17 Nebraska-- 17.86 yards

Pass Efficency

#2 Nebraska-- 90.10

#15 Missouri-- 108.04

Total Defense

#18 Nebraska-- 305.86 yards

#38 Missouri-- 339.14 yards

Turnover Margin

#19 Missouri--.86

#43 Nebraska--.29

http://www.ncaa.com/sports/m-footbl/ncaa-m-footbl-body.html

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It looks like we play into each others' strengths. Their rush defense is the best part of their defense, while our rush offense is the best part of our offense, statistically speaking. Our pass defense is the best part of our defense, while their passing attack is the best part of their offense.

I think this game comes down to turnovers and I remember seeing a stat pop up during the Oklahoma State game that said we have turned the ball over 22 times at home this year. If we fix that, I think we have a good chance of winning this game.

 
308_Husker said:
It looks like we play into each others' strengths. Their rush defense is the best part of their defense, while our rush offense is the best part of our offense, statistically speaking. Our pass defense is the best part of our defense, while their passing attack is the best part of their offense.

I think this game comes down to turnovers and I remember seeing a stat pop up during the Oklahoma State game that said we have turned the ball over 22 times at home this year. If we fix that, I think we have a good chance of winning this game.
Click to expand...
Thats what I was thinkin too after looking at these stats. So what if we give up some rushing yards, as long as shut their pass down alittle bit, I believe we have a pretty good shot at winning. I dont think Mizzou can run straight at us the whole game and expect to win. I expect Mizzou to take some shots at our corners given the success Blackmon had against us.

 
Here are a few more good ones (this is only through week 6):

cfbstats

Tackles for Loss

#17 Missouri--48

#119 Nebraska--21

Sacks

#6 Missouri--20

#68 Nebraska--11

Sacks Allowed

#20 Missouri--7

#31 Nebraska--8

 
SOS is also relevant to these stats. SOS, according to Sagarin:

Missouri - 30

Nebraska - 41

 
It will be a great game but Missouri will need help from us if they want to win. I think the game is ours to lose.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tora! Tora! Tora! said:
Here are a few more good ones (this is only through week 6):

cfbstats

Tackles for Loss

#17 Missouri--48

#119 Nebraska--21

Sacks

#6 Missouri--20

#68 Nebraska--11

Sacks Allowed

#20 Missouri--7

#31 Nebraska--8
Click to expand...
Tackles for Loss

#17 Missouri-- 7.29

#119 Nebraska-- 3.14 Holy f*&*

Sacks

#9 Missouri-- 3.00

#72 Nebraska-- 1.71

Sacks Allowed

#17 Missouri-- 1.00

#33 Nebraska-- 1.29

from Ncaa site, it says updated on 10/23.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
huskerscott said:
Tora! Tora! Tora! said:
Here are a few more good ones (this is only through week 6):

cfbstats

Tackles for Loss

#17 Missouri--48

#119 Nebraska--21

Sacks

#6 Missouri--20

#68 Nebraska--11

Sacks Allowed

#20 Missouri--7

#31 Nebraska--8
Click to expand...
Tackles for Loss

#17 Missouri-- 7.29

#119 Nebraska-- 3.14 Holy f*&*

Sacks

#9 Missouri-- 3.00

#72 Nebraska-- 1.71

Sacks Allowed

#17 Missouri-- 1.00

#33 Nebraska-- 1.29

from Ncaa site, it says updated on 10/23.
Click to expand...
This one is big for me. Our defense has not been creating many TFLs. I think this mainly comes from our primary defensive scheme. We just don't send a lot of guys in the backfield to create TFLs. We try to keep the play in front of us and have good man coverage. I sometimes wonder what would happen if we loaded the line/ blitzed more often.

 
I See Red People said:
huskerscott said:
Tora! Tora! Tora! said:
Here are a few more good ones (this is only through week 6):

cfbstats

Tackles for Loss

#17 Missouri--48

#119 Nebraska--21

Sacks

#6 Missouri--20

#68 Nebraska--11

Sacks Allowed

#20 Missouri--7

#31 Nebraska--8
Click to expand...
Tackles for Loss

#17 Missouri-- 7.29

#119 Nebraska-- 3.14 Holy f*&*

Sacks

#9 Missouri-- 3.00

#72 Nebraska-- 1.71

Sacks Allowed

#17 Missouri-- 1.00

#33 Nebraska-- 1.29

from Ncaa site, it says updated on 10/23.
Click to expand...
This one is big for me. Our defense has not been creating many TFLs. I think this mainly comes from our primary defensive scheme. We just don't send a lot of guys in the backfield to create TFLs. We try to keep the play in front of us and have good man coverage. I sometimes wonder what would happen if we loaded the line/ blitzed more often.
Click to expand...
How often do we Blitz?

 
it's the curse of the decommitted quarterbacks. Josh Freeman never beat us. Blaine Gabbert failed last year. he'll fail again this year.

Skerz 27

Mizzou 20

 
308_Husker said:
It looks like we play into each others' strengths. Their rush defense is the best part of their defense, while our rush offense is the best part of our offense, statistically speaking. Our pass defense is the best part of our defense, while their passing attack is the best part of their offense.

I think this game comes down to turnovers and I remember seeing a stat pop up during the Oklahoma State game that said we have turned the ball over 22 times at home this year. If we fix that, I think we have a good chance of winning this game.
Click to expand...
Negative. We have 23 fumbles (tied for worst in the NCAA), and have lost 8 of them (104th). We have 13 turnovers total

Completely unacceptable

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top