No. You would have to compare him to guys who have been playing WR for 4-12 years. He isn't as agile as the few who have converted. Who knows about his catching and route running. Simple as I wouldn't take him over Reilly, Moore, or Westerkamp and that's 3 kids just at Nebraska who weren't invited to the combineCan Tommy Armstrong be a productive NFL wide receiver? Maybe with that speed, 4.6 ain't bad (rounding up with hand time)
I would think Tommy would be a MUCH better running back at the next level. Maybe he could even get some snaps at HBack or TE (off-set off the line).Can Tommy Armstrong be a productive NFL wide receiver? Maybe with that speed, 4.6 ain't bad (rounding up with hand time)
Oh my. This would not be pretty to watch. TE? You have to wonder was this his idea?!??Tommy was performing as a TE, not a WR
Why would that be so bad?Oh my. This would not be pretty to watch. TE? You have to wonder was this his idea?!??Tommy was performing as a TE, not a WR
It isn't. I wish him luck, but I don't see him playing in the NFL at any positionWhy would that be so bad?Oh my. This would not be pretty to watch. TE? You have to wonder was this his idea?!??Tommy was performing as a TE, not a WR
Edelman ran a 4.52 at his pro day. And all of Armstrong's other numbers match up pretty nicely with Edelman.No. You would have to compare him to guys who have been playing WR for 4-12 years. He isn't as agile as the few who have converted. Who knows about his catching and route running. Simple as I wouldn't take him over Reilly, Moore, or Westerkamp and that's 3 kids just at Nebraska who weren't invited to the combineCan Tommy Armstrong be a productive NFL wide receiver? Maybe with that speed, 4.6 ain't bad (rounding up with hand time)
Pryor is 6'4 and runs a 4.4
Edelman is shorter quick guy who also ran a 4.4
Braxton Miller and Denard Robinson ran a 4.4
Matt Jones was 6'6 and a 4.3 - 4.4
a 4.52 is pretty dang close to a 4.55. From a measurable standpoint that is a very solid compEdelman ran a 4.52 at his pro day. And all of Armstrong's other numbers match up pretty nicely with Edelman.No. You would have to compare him to guys who have been playing WR for 4-12 years. He isn't as agile as the few who have converted. Who knows about his catching and route running. Simple as I wouldn't take him over Reilly, Moore, or Westerkamp and that's 3 kids just at Nebraska who weren't invited to the combineCan Tommy Armstrong be a productive NFL wide receiver? Maybe with that speed, 4.6 ain't bad (rounding up with hand time)
Pryor is 6'4 and runs a 4.4
Edelman is shorter quick guy who also ran a 4.4
Braxton Miller and Denard Robinson ran a 4.4
Matt Jones was 6'6 and a 4.3 - 4.4
Bench:
Edelman - 14
Armstrong - 16
Vertical:
Edelman - 36.5
Armstrong - 37.5
Broad Jump:
Edelman - 10'03"
Armstrong - 10'03"
Edelman's agility is on a different planet than Armstrong's. Again, he won't play in the NFLa 4.52 is pretty dang close to a 4.55. From a measurable standpoint that is a very solid compEdelman ran a 4.52 at his pro day. And all of Armstrong's other numbers match up pretty nicely with Edelman.No. You would have to compare him to guys who have been playing WR for 4-12 years. He isn't as agile as the few who have converted. Who knows about his catching and route running. Simple as I wouldn't take him over Reilly, Moore, or Westerkamp and that's 3 kids just at Nebraska who weren't invited to the combineCan Tommy Armstrong be a productive NFL wide receiver? Maybe with that speed, 4.6 ain't bad (rounding up with hand time)
Pryor is 6'4 and runs a 4.4
Edelman is shorter quick guy who also ran a 4.4
Braxton Miller and Denard Robinson ran a 4.4
Matt Jones was 6'6 and a 4.3 - 4.4
Bench:
Edelman - 14
Armstrong - 16
Vertical:
Edelman - 36.5
Armstrong - 37.5
Broad Jump:
Edelman - 10'03"
Armstrong - 10'03"
Guessing because most TEs are taller and have played TE.Why would that be so bad?Oh my. This would not be pretty to watch. TE? You have to wonder was this his idea?!??Tommy was performing as a TE, not a WR
T-Mart also couldn't pass a physicalEdelman's agility is on a different planet than Armstrong's. Again, he won't play in the NFLa 4.52 is pretty dang close to a 4.55. From a measurable standpoint that is a very solid compEdelman ran a 4.52 at his pro day. And all of Armstrong's other numbers match up pretty nicely with Edelman.No. You would have to compare him to guys who have been playing WR for 4-12 years. He isn't as agile as the few who have converted. Who knows about his catching and route running. Simple as I wouldn't take him over Reilly, Moore, or Westerkamp and that's 3 kids just at Nebraska who weren't invited to the combineCan Tommy Armstrong be a productive NFL wide receiver? Maybe with that speed, 4.6 ain't bad (rounding up with hand time)
Pryor is 6'4 and runs a 4.4
Edelman is shorter quick guy who also ran a 4.4
Braxton Miller and Denard Robinson ran a 4.4
Matt Jones was 6'6 and a 4.3 - 4.4
Bench:
Edelman - 14
Armstrong - 16
Vertical:
Edelman - 36.5
Armstrong - 37.5
Broad Jump:
Edelman - 10'03"
Armstrong - 10'03"
T Mart ran a 4.4, 39 inch vertical and a 10'9'' broad jump --- doesn't always matter