Interesting turn of perspective and I appreciate it. Here is what you are talking about:When speaking about Native Americans, though, there is a certain real travesty still taking place to this day; I read somewhere that Native Americans cannot buy the land they live on in the reservation. To me, that is just wrong.
The tribe I belong to, the Rosebud Sioux Tribe of South Dakota, was 'given' an area of land, sort of. First, we were granted the Black Hills in South Dakota by treaty, our ancestral homeland at the time. When gold was discovered there we were run off to the Pine Ridge and Rosebud reservations. There was a neat little 'freeway' between the reservations to allow the gold hunters access to the Black Hills which were originally promised to us.
Now, when the reservations were started there were concerns about Indians selling their land irresponsibly or losing them in some other fashion. End result was the US government decided these lands could not be sold or partitioned. BUT, the heirs would all retain their rights to the land. Now, 5-8 generations on, I am the owner of an undefined few hundred acres somewhere in southern South Dakota, along with 1200 or so relatives, that none of us can find or do anything with. The US government continues to lease this out and sen us checks for about 20 dollars per year.
I'd rather have the Black Hills which were ours by treaty, even if they weren't in my name. In the tribe's name would be fine.
Apologies for the history lesson.
GBR