I would pick Limp Bizkit over Linkin Park anyday and would say that Limp Bizkit had more popular songs and has a bigger fan basei didnt even know linkin park was still together??
much less making music... i guess from reading this tread they are still kinda popular... thats cool for sure
but i kinda put them into that limp bizcuit catigory
Which is dwarfed by musical luminaries like Britney Spears, N'Sync, and Nickelback.I would pick Limp Bizkit over Linkin Park anyday and would say that Limp Bizkit had more popular songs and has a bigger fan basei didnt even know linkin park was still together??
much less making music... i guess from reading this tread they are still kinda popular... thats cool for sure
but i kinda put them into that limp bizcuit catigory
One could easily argue it does though. Britney Spears, N'Sync, and Nickelback are/have been some of the most talented musicians worldwide. I'm not a fan of either of those three musicians/bands, but they all have/had millions of fans and their sales prove it, as well as the numerous awards/platinum cd's they had. You have to like em if you're going to buy em. And, if a lot of people are buying, a lot of people are liking.Which is dwarfed by musical luminaries like Britney Spears, N'Sync, and Nickelback.I would pick Limp Bizkit over Linkin Park anyday and would say that Limp Bizkit had more popular songs and has a bigger fan basei didnt even know linkin park was still together??
much less making music... i guess from reading this tread they are still kinda popular... thats cool for sure
but i kinda put them into that limp bizcuit catigory
Singles and sales don't mean talent, compadre.
Great post. +1IMO, Linkin Park began to pawn their sound piecemeal the minute Hybrid Theory sold half a gagillion copies, and with what I've heard of this album, the garage sale has just about ended. For one album they were a band in an age of singles that you could actually feel justified dropping fifteen bucks on. They were always inconsistent songwriters, but over time I think the problem has gotten worse. I wasn't sure whether to laugh or cry at Minutes to Midnight. In their defense, they're not Simon and Garfunkel and probably never wanted to be, but the regression of the whole product has left me with them where I'm at with all modern rock and nu-metal––I just don't care, it's too boring.
Not to take a dump on what people like (the best band is the one you love, whatever anyone says), but Linkin Park simply isn't talented enough to reinvent their entire sound, especially when their most praiseworthy album worked mostly because they turned simplicity into a kind of originality with what I'd call sound effects (someone help me out if there's a technical term for the industrial bang of "By Myself" or even "Papercut"). Out of fairness I'll give the whole thing a listen one of these days, but my initial reaction is that they've completed their descent into mediocrity.
Meh, I'd be interested to see just how many people prefer one over the other. Limp Bizkit has always been a little too...stupid..for me. Don't take that the wrong way if you are a fan, but it's just my personal taste naturally. I think Linkin Park may end up being the more timeless band some day.I would pick Limp Bizkit over Linkin Park anyday and would say that Limp Bizkit had more popular songs and has a bigger fan basei didnt even know linkin park was still together??
much less making music... i guess from reading this tread they are still kinda popular... thats cool for sure
but i kinda put them into that limp bizcuit catigory
i didnt even know linkin park was still together??
much less making music... i guess from reading this tread they are still kinda popular... thats cool for sure
but i kinda put them into that limp bizcuit catigory
I would pick Limp Bizkit over Linkin Park anyday and would say that Limp Bizkit had more popular songs and has a bigger fan basei didnt even know linkin park was still together??
much less making music... i guess from reading this tread they are still kinda popular... thats cool for sure
but i kinda put them into that limp bizcuit catigory
Meh, I'd be interested to see just how many people prefer one over the other. Limp Bizkit has always been a little too...stupid..for me. Don't take that the wrong way if you are a fan, but it's just my personal taste naturally. I think Linkin Park may end up being the more timeless band some day.
Sales is not a direct reflection on the level of talent, not in our day and age. When you have enormous recording industries selecting bands or often times creating them out of nothing and using the MTVs of the world and a singles culture to promote sales, big bucks aren't hard to come by as long as the people are at least talented enough to not embarrass themselves.One could easily argue it does though. Britney Spears, N'Sync, and Nickelback are/have been some of the most talented musicians worldwide. I'm not a fan of either of those three musicians/bands, but they all have/had millions of fans and their sales prove it, as well as the numerous awards/platinum cd's they had. You have to like em if you're going to buy em. And, if a lot of people are buying, a lot of people are liking.Which is dwarfed by musical luminaries like Britney Spears, N'Sync, and Nickelback.I would pick Limp Bizkit over Linkin Park anyday and would say that Limp Bizkit had more popular songs and has a bigger fan basei didnt even know linkin park was still together??
much less making music... i guess from reading this tread they are still kinda popular... thats cool for sure
but i kinda put them into that limp bizcuit catigory
Singles and sales don't mean talent, compadre.
That said, I'm not the one who is going to argue that. I tend to avoid any Nickelback talks considering they used to be one of my favorite bands and now I think they are gigantic sell outs.
Fixed it for ya. One of the main reason Limp Bizket faded was because of their guitarist decided to leave the band when they started getting worldwide fame to start his own stuff and fans and critics basically turned on Limp Bizket. To say that Limp Bizket are not real artists/musicians is absurb and ridiculous.Limp Bizkit was a bunch of rockstars livin' the life and made unbelievable music that people embraced, and that fades out so quick, whereas Linkin Park, whether they are good at it or not, live their life trying to be artists and musicians.