Redux
Assistant Coach
I don’t think my question was difficult to understand.
But it is comparing apples to fig newtons
I don’t think my question was difficult to understand.
I realize I’m a bit peeved right now, but I just want to point out that “Just sayin’” is the most pointless expression in the History of the English Language. It adds nothing to your comment or your ability to wiggle out from responsibility for what you said before it. It lowers the public perception of your IQ by any number of points (and never RAISES IT).
No one knew Dabo was going to be the coach he turned out to be when he was 19-15 after 3 seasons with one of them being a losing one. I bet if you asked most Clemson fans, they were ready to give him the boot.But it is comparing apples to fig newtons
No one knew Dabo was going to be the coach he turned out to be when he was 19-15 after 3 seasons with one of them being a losing one. I bet if you asked most Clemson fans, they were ready to give him the boot.
So if we are to show patience for Frost after 2 games (which of course we should) because Dabo went 19-15 in his first 3 years at Clemson, then why did we fire Riley and not give him patience after 3 years?
Edit: For the record-I feel Riley should have been fired before going 4-8.
No one knew Dabo was going to be the coach he turned out to be when he was 19-15 after 3 seasons with one of them being a losing one. I bet if you asked most Clemson fans, they were ready to give him the boot.
So if we are to show patience for Frost after 2 games (which of course we should) because Dabo went 19-15 in his first 3 years at Clemson, then why did we fire Riley and not give him patience after 3 years?
Edit: For the record-I feel Riley should have been fired before going 4-8.
It's only better because there were 4 fewer gamesIs it really necessary to try to argue out every one of these points?
Maybe because 19-15 is better than 19-19?
Probably because Dabo's at the end of Dabo's third season he had won the division and finished ranked?
Probably because Riley's third season was a complete dumpster fire?
It's only better because there were 4 fewer games
Clemson's 3rd season under Swinney, they were 6-7.
One could argue Dabo's 3rd season was just barely better than a trainwreck
I probably wouldn't have. He at least went 6-6 in the regular season. And Clemson was fairly competitive in the losses.So, would you have fired Dabo before then?
I probably wouldn't have. He at least went 6-6 in the regular season. And Clemson was fairly competitive in the losses.
Why do we argue or discuss anything?Then why are you arguing this point?
Cause he has to argue everything. Don't you know he's always right?Then why are you arguing this point?
Why do we argue or discuss anything?
The question I asked was to the poster that simply said Dabo went 19-15 in his first 3 years.So you admit to arguing a point that you don't even agree with? I fail to see the logic here., is it for funsies?
Hold on...you are not arguing FOR Riley are you? You are just arguing against the argument, right?It's only better because there were 4 fewer games
Clemson's 3rd season under Swinney, they were 6-7.
One could argue Dabo's 3rd season was just barely better than a trainwreck