If you haven't already, look at his body language in the game against Iowa and MSU. He was nowhere near as comfortable and in rhythm in those match-ups opposed to arguably one of his best games of the season against us.This should create problems for Robinson. Force him to throw under pressure and he will make bad choices.
MSU beat Robinson like a drum and it showed. I think that is a great strategy to follow. I am hoping that do to last years inexperience on the DL and secondary, Bo and Co held off blitzing for fear DR would kill us if he broke contain. This year, with an experienced D seeing the field, more aggressive line play and a more physical secondary I hope to see us hit him every snap and get him thinking and gun shy to keep the ball.If you haven't already, look at his body language in the game against Iowa and MSU. He was nowhere near as comfortable and in rhythm in those match-ups opposed to arguably one of his best games of the season against us.This should create problems for Robinson. Force him to throw under pressure and he will make bad choices.
Seems accurate to me, based on the Kaz interviews I've watched.So it appears the story here is not changing schemes, but teaching some new technique to our linemen - is that fair to say? Less dramatic, but perhaps no less productive.
I completely agree. He's a ferocious dude. He should be making a pretty big jump this year in terms of production.I still say Rome is going to be a great player for us. He has that attitude about him that's been missing from the defense for a long time, minus Suh. He showed that in the Minnesota game and against a paper towel dispenser at the airport in Wisconsin. :lol:
"Hey! Eric! What's your diet consist of?"I feel like this picture isn't getting enough love!saunders45 said:
That made no sense. They could also see an 83 place improvement or a 30 place decrease. What are you basing your seemingly random number on?According to last year's stats, Nebraska could see a 30 place improvement in Sacks and TFL's.
I'm cornfused! So are we better or not?!?That made no sense. They could also see an 83 place improvement or a 30 place decrease. What are you basing your seemingly random number on?According to last year's stats, Nebraska could see a 30 place improvement in Sacks and TFL's.
"according to last year's stats" we're precisely 30 places better, because... Something.I'm cornfused! So are we better or not?!?That made no sense. They could also see an 83 place improvement or a 30 place decrease. What are you basing your seemingly random number on?According to last year's stats, Nebraska could see a 30 place improvement in Sacks and TFL's.