I thought they were scandinavian. Or is that Minnesota? No offense meant. Lot of attractive girls in Wisconsin. Mmmmh breastNo one insults our fräuleins and gets away with it.
It's hard to be nice to db's. They're always right. Ask them.WoodyHayes1951 said:Glad to have the Huskers in the Big Ten being an OSU fan.
Overall it's a homerun. Midwest school, national fanbase and profile, great history, academics,and the fans are as passionate as they come and they expect excellence(which the Big Ten needs more of)
Really looking forward to the game we play in The Shoe this year and I'm hoping that my alumni tix will be that game. My guess is that it will be a night game.
Hopefully we can keep the rowdyness down. We weren't too kind to Texas fans when they came in but we've done better since. didn't see bad when Miami of Florida or USC came to town.
I think the move was a good one for the Huskers. Nebraska was able to retain their football reputation by moving to a weaker conference rather than having to make the death-march of the Big 12's round robin schedule where the Huskers anemic defense and sputtering offense would have been exposed weekend after weekend by teams like OK State, Baylor, Oklahoma and...yes...even Iowa State. Much better to play in a conference where you can take a weekend or two off every now an then against teams like Minnesota, Indiana and Illinois...
Don't get me wrong...I love the Huskers but I think the program dodged the really big "we are no longer relevant in the conference" bullet by getting out when it did.
I DO miss the trips to Lincoln to watch my Cyclones drub the Huskers in basketball once a year however...
We miss you too, Cy.I think the move was a good one for the Huskers. Nebraska was able to retain their football reputation by moving to a weaker conference rather than having to make the death-march of the Big 12's round robin schedule where the Huskers anemic defense and sputtering offense would have been exposed weekend after weekend by teams like OK State, Baylor, Oklahoma and...yes...even Iowa State. Much better to play in a conference where you can take a weekend or two off every now an then against teams like Minnesota, Indiana and Illinois...
Don't get me wrong...I love the Huskers but I think the program dodged the really big "we are no longer relevant in the conference" bullet by getting out when it did.
I DO miss the trips to Lincoln to watch my Cyclones drub the Huskers in basketball once a year however...
1. Amazing. You guys beat Nebraska once every twenty years and you think you're on our level and can hang with us on a year end, year out level? LMAO. The last time you beat Nebrasks you went +8 in turnovers and you won by two points. Do you think that if Iowa State plays Nebraska and loses 8 turnovers that the Huskers would only win by two points? We'd win by 70+ easily. As for the rest of your "argument" Baylor is going back into the toilet without RG3 and Okie St loses their QB and top WR so they'll be down. Texas is pretty much through as Mack Brown has pretty much ran his course. Oklahoma, well no change there they'll still be exceptional.I think the move was a good one for the Huskers. Nebraska was able to retain their football reputation by moving to a weaker conference rather than having to make the death-march of the Big 12's round robin schedule where the Huskers anemic defense and sputtering offense would have been exposed weekend after weekend by teams like OK State, Baylor, Oklahoma and...yes...even Iowa State. Much better to play in a conference where you can take a weekend or two off every now an then against teams like Minnesota, Indiana and Illinois...
Don't get me wrong...I love the Huskers but I think the program dodged the really big "we are no longer relevant in the conference" bullet by getting out when it did.
I DO miss the trips to Lincoln to watch my Cyclones drub the Huskers in basketball once a year however...