Offending Posts Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Horace said:
Snowflake sighting. Crying because your President said something mean. Poor baby. Find your safe space.
Click to expand...




Hey Horace, you're not going to be long for this sub or huskerboard in general if you're only interesting in boosting your ego by mudslinging and calling names. You're absolutely welcome in the fray (I'd love to have more reasonable conservative voices in the P&R forum honestly), but only if you contribute to actual conversation. So far, you're just being a d!(k.

 
Husker_luver said:
That’s how recruiting goes. Get over it.
Click to expand...
I'm over it, and i'm damn sure gonna call out people for it.

So you and your 600 posts can find someone else to quote if you don't like it. The ignore feature is available to you.

BIG ERN said:
With a coaching staff change I don't think integrity should be questioned 
Click to expand...


....INTEGRITY being brought up by me is about WOODBEY, not Cam Brown. I have no problem with Cam Brown switching to tOSU.

 
While you guys are enjoying your post count. The rest of us will enjoy the finer things in life........

17-bounce-tastic-sofia-vergara-gifs-image-1.gif


 
zoogs said:
I think I have one overriding priority right now and that is

1) not desiring authoritarian rule
Click to expand...


I'm curious how many people actually do desire it. I'm sure it's not a large percentage of the population, but seeing interviews with some of the Trumpanzee's out there, it seems to me that some people do want that "Dear Leader" that they put their faith in implicitly. 

 
mrandyk said:
I used to work in graduate admissions. The number of applications we got from Nigeria (and Iran, Nepal, and India) were crazy. Probably like 80-90% of all international applicants.

Did you finally realize you never had a coherent point to begin with?
Click to expand...


lol, this must be one of those posts that a number of people preached about... So, do as I say, not as I do.. typical liberal a-hole logic!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ric Flair said:
Why not have kids qualify for athletic scholarship based on a cumulative grievance score rather than athletic ability?

Give kids points for being a minority, female, gay or sexually confused, or overcoming a tough childhood. Then take points away for being white, male, fast, strong, cisgender, coming from wealthy families, and otherwise exhibiting signs of white privilege.

I think sexually confused, slow, fat, unathletic, transgender Asians  who have overcome rough childhoods are historically underrepresented in sports like football. That’s unfair.
Click to expand...




2b8710e0e1e3178b9eb1487be8ab9ed6.jpg


 
The notion there exists a single definition which roughly 50% of the population should seek to conform to seems sexist and misogynistic. Each woman (or dude with a penis and a mental illness that makes him think he should have been born without said penis, or would rather have boobs, or wear dresses, etc.) should be able to define femininity in her, his, xer (or insert preferred personal pronoun here) terms. 

Bad thread. I am offended.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top