Have you seperated [sic] what is news and opinion on Fox. Sure there is opinion, but their actual news is usually spot on and they do report it each way. Breitbart I never read and haven't been to their site in 4-5 years, Drudge is now full on Liberal if you haven't notices and I wouldn't know much about the Daily Caller either
It's irrelevant. Opinions need to have a factual basis, and someone spouting something as a fact (like Newt did), even in an opinion section, is still disingenuous (
you'll probably have to look this word up) and dangerous, and it still warrants retraction. And it's been proven that Fox News' "news" is anything but spot on--it's morons that can't actually be bothered to look at information on their own that would suggest something as ignorant as that.
- This statement is undoubtedly false AF, and it was actually Newt regurgitating a news story Fox News concocted by taking quotes from a disgraced former homicide detective and twisting them into some perverse narrative. The story has been proven false even by Wheeler himself. Do we really know for sure on that one yet. Sounds like Arkancide to me!
- Fox News has yet to retract their statements about this, and the narrative was especially painful for Seth Rich's parents, native Nebraskans from Omaha. I feel sorry for the parents, since no parent should have to deal with sort of thing. Seth's parents are buying the story they were given. That's fine, but the whole story hasn't been told by a long shot.
Thanks for showing everyone on the board that you have no concept of reality, especially since this
conspiracy theory has been thoroughly debunked. Also, your use of Arkancide is something a person with the mental capacity of a 10 year old would trot out in lieu of actual facts, like the mindless hypocrites that want to lock Hilary Clinton up for her emails when
Jared Kushner is doing the same thing.
The difference I see is that while regular news outlets and sites may sometimes get something wrong, they strive to make things right and typically own up to anything they got wrong. Conversely, sites that aren't considered MSM routinely spout mistruths as fact, don't retract when they get something wrong, and sometimes even double down on what they got wrong if it fits the narrative they're trying to push. Outlets like Fox News, Breitbart, and their ilk are not only dangerous, but are traitors to our country by willingly pushing misinformation to citizens. Are you saying that CNN and MSMBC don't do the this. They are so deep in the weeds with the Democrats, I'll never forget Wolf Blitzer having a toast of champagne after Hillary was nominated. Also the fact that most of the news people on those networks are married to people that where in the Obama Administration leaves no doubt that their is a very heavy bias for the Democrats.
Wolf Blitzer had a champagne toast because it was the first female to run for President with the nomination of either the Democrats or Republicans, but typically misogynists that trot that out aren't nuanced enough to understand that. Also, last time I checked, none of the MSNBC or CNN journalists are actively campaigning for Democrats or Republicans,
unlike "journalists" on Fox News are. But hey, I'm sure you're more than willing to make an excuse because it's your guy in office, and integrity and honesty aren't currency you trade in.
Well I didn't have to explain that one to her, since she is married and off on her own. But you know what even she as a 30 year could see for herself what the Stormy Daniels thing was all about. You know it's a fact that very very wealthy men and women get shaken down all the time in situations like this. Heck I know Trump isn't perfect, but he did something like your saying he did it on his own time not in the oval office. I compare what Bill Clinton did to getting a hummer right on the altar at church. Also the attorney that Stormy had was joke, and in the end the Judge ordered Stormy to pay Trumps Attorney fees. When money is involved bimbos appear all the time. You should have realized by now when this crap is pulled on Trump it will never stick.
First, the bimbo thing has already been covered, and thanks for confirming to everyone you are a misogynist. Kinda feel bad your daughter has to have a racist and misogynist for a parent. Women in this world deserve better than someone like you.
Oh sweet baby Jesus tap dancing on a peed-on hooker bed, here we go with the MAGA crowd trying to use big words like "socialism" again without understanding what it means. I'd love to see what our poster thinks it means and why it's so evil...and if they're willing to tell the Social Security office that he doesn't need their money after all. If I'd have had a choice, I would never had paid into social security, but since I have, it is my right to take that "paid for benefit" when it is my time. Unlike the people who get benefits and have never paid a nickel into it. Had I been able to invest that same money I put in over my lifetime of work, I would have had a far bigger benefit today. Where the heck do you think Social Security comes from anyway? The government? Or as one person getting government payments said, "it's Barack money." Heck no it's my money, I paid into the system and it's part of my retirement plan.
Oh, so you
don't have any principles then? That's good to know, since you were so against Socialism before. Still waiting for you to define and provide an explanation on why it's so bad (especially since you want to use socialism).
Also, that people get Social Security benefits without paying into the program is bulls***. Someone has to pay into it from your family to get it. So again, you fall victim to unchecked ignorance. That's a pattern with you, it seems. Plus calling it "Barack money" because you perceive people get it for free without working? That statement is based off of unfounded stereotypes that racists perpetuate against African Americans...so thanks for confirming your racism to the board?
Oh, which people, praytell? And no, Trump is nowhere close to perfect, but you've seriously been looking for an illiterate, ignorant, bankrupt fame-slut for 20 years to put in the White House? You must not have been looking too hard then... Well he is an American Citizen that has had the ability to amass a wealth of around 12 Billion Dollars even after going bankrupt which many good people do. I think he learned from it considering where he has come from and would say he is far from illiterate. No dummy goes bankrupt then makes 12 billion.
You, nor anyone else outside of his accountant, know his true worth because he won't release his tax returns (due to Trump's cowardice on the matter).
And as far as transparency goes, last time I checked, we still don't have Trump's tax returns made public, the White House isn't providing documentation requested in the course of an investigation, and Trump has committed numerous crimes, including obstruction of justice. I mean, I suppose to someone that's blind, this administration would look as transparent as any other, right? Tax returns being release is an optional thing. Past President did it on their own. I can't imagine if most people would even understand a tax return of the nature and size of Donald Trump. You should be more concerned that the most wealthy man in our country, pays no taxes and that's Jeff Bezos of Amazon, the guy that owns the far far left rag the Washington Post who weekly get info illegally from the CIA on false Trump reports. There has been no obstruction or we would have heard about it long ago. Just keep dreaming and have a sweet dream on that!
Ah, the ole chestnut of the mentally feeble and morally inept in arguments--diversion. Jeff Bezos has nothing to do with this discussion.
Releasing tax returns is not going to be optional in multiple states going forward (if you want to get on the ballot). Plus, it was something candidates did to show that they were divested from any private holdings when running (or occupying) the office, and to provide transparency. The fact that Trump won't release his shows cowardice and strongly suggests, in light of recent developments, he has something to hide.
As for as being complicated, that's probably why media outlets would consult tax experts to break the documents down. And while I wouldn't expect you to understand them, there are many folks in this forum that I would expect could at least muddle through on their own with no problem, just because they have a high school (or better) education.
Frankly, it's obvious you've got some issues going on, as evidenced by your racism, your misogyny, and your inability to actually discern fiction from fact. Next to nothing you have said is true or close to being true, and at this point, I'm even questioning if you really have a daughter (because your grasp on reality is so tenuous).